> > 2) Use libuv instead
I just saw the libuv library in the CMake sources.
> libuv for process management is on the list. I think it is waiting for
> porting to all of CMake's platforms to actually happen.
Does that mean it's only there for some specific scenarios and shouldn't
be used in
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 20:34:53 +0100, Sebastian Holtermann wrote:
> 2) Use libuv instead
libuv for process management is on the list. I think it is waiting for
porting to all of CMake's platforms to actually happen. I'm seeing this
PR hung up on process:
Cool. I'd like to have parallel automoc and uic.
How about this 4th option?
Don't use threads. A single thread is able to spawn multiple processes, and
wait on multiple processes, and react when 1 or more processes change state.
I'm probably not familiar enough with kwsysProcess to know if
On Freitag, 5. Januar 2018 13:00:30 CET clin...@elemtech.com wrote:
> Cool. I'd like to have parallel automoc and uic.
>
> How about this 4th option?
> Don't use threads. A single thread is able to spawn multiple processes, and
> wait on multiple processes, and react when 1 or more processes
Hello!
As you might have noticed I tried to parallelize AUTOMOC/UIC.
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/1632
The issue that's blocking it now is that the kwsysProcess framework
isn't thread safe. As a consequence it is not possible for threads to
start processes concurrently
I realise I wasn't very clear in my previous explanation. Hopefully this
paints a better picture;
- We have 40 or so developers spread across Visual Studio 2015 (MSBuild -
Windows), Xcode (macOS) and Make/Clang (Linux). 80% use Windows.
- We have a core set of libs in use by a number of projects
