Re: [cmake-developers] Eclipse CDT Managed build

2017-01-26 Thread Bøe , Sebastian
[0]. [0] http://start.atmel.com/ http://www.st.com/en/embedded-software/stm32cube-embedded-software.html -Original Message- From: Brad King [mailto:brad.k...@kitware.com] Sent: 26. januar 2017 14:18 To: Bøe, Sebastian <sebastian@nordicsemi.no> Cc: ben.boec...@kitware.com;

Re: [cmake-developers] Eclipse CDT Managed build

2017-01-26 Thread Bøe , Sebastian
as the best suited technology for my use-case. -Original Message- From: Brad King [mailto:brad.k...@kitware.com] Sent: 25. januar 2017 17:38 To: Bøe, Sebastian <sebastian@nordicsemi.no> Cc: ben.boec...@kitware.com; cmake-developers@cmake.org Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Eclipse CDT M

Re: [cmake-developers] Eclipse CDT Managed build

2017-01-25 Thread Bøe , Sebastian
- From: Ben Boeckel [mailto:ben.boec...@kitware.com] Sent: 25. januar 2017 16:31 To: Bøe, Sebastian <sebastian@nordicsemi.no> Cc: cmake-developers@cmake.org Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Eclipse CDT Managed build On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 14:51:26 +0000, Bøe, Sebastian wrote: > But in

Re: [cmake-developers] Eclipse CDT Managed build

2017-01-25 Thread Bøe , Sebastian
of temporarily doing simple project configuration through the IDE UI. -Original Message- From: Ben Boeckel [mailto:ben.boec...@kitware.com] Sent: 25. januar 2017 15:43 To: Bøe, Sebastian <sebastian@nordicsemi.no> Cc: cmake-developers@cmake.org Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] E

[cmake-developers] Eclipse CDT Managed build

2017-01-25 Thread Bøe , Sebastian
Hi, I was wondering if anyone has given thought to if it is feasible to have generator support for Eclipse CDT Managed builds? My motivation for managed build's instead of external Makefile builds, is that after CMake generation the project can be configured through the IDE UI. Which is a useful