The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15149
==
Reported By:sleske
Assigned To:
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:38:44 Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, David Cole wrote:
> > > In this case just the one. I'm not that ambitious as I'm just
> > > volunteering my time to various FOSS projects and still have to
> > > maintain a day job to pay the bills!
>
On 09/10/2014 05:33 PM, Brad King wrote:
Thanks. I've updated the topic to include all the actual fixes
for CMP0054 warnings within CMake's own code that I've found so
far.
Thanks!
I have a few more changes to request that you add to the topic:
* The wording of the warning says what the cha
Brad King wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 06:32 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> I saw the addition of the VS_WINRT_COMPONENT property. This seems to be
>> an attribute to mark an executable specially so that it is built with
>> appropriate flags for the WinRT platform.
>
> Yes. It is similar to the WIN32_EXE
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, David Cole wrote:
> > In this case just the one. I'm not that ambitious as I'm just
> > volunteering my time to various FOSS projects and still have to
> > maintain a day job to pay the bills!
>
> In that case, I would recommend just getting it into shape so that
On 09/08/2014 11:35 AM, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> I updated the topic, squished and merged.
Thanks. I've updated the topic to include all the actual fixes
for CMP0054 warnings within CMake's own code that I've found so
far.
I have a few more changes to request that you add to the topic:
* The wordi
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15148
==
Reported By:a.grudin
Assigned To:
On 09/09/2014 06:32 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I saw the addition of the VS_WINRT_COMPONENT property. This seems to be an
> attribute to mark an executable specially so that it is built with
> appropriate flags for the WinRT platform.
Yes. It is similar to the WIN32_EXECUTABLE target property.
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15147
==
Reported By:Felix Geyer
Assigned To:
> In this case just the one. I'm not that ambitious as I'm just
> volunteering my time to various FOSS projects and still have to
> maintain a day job to pay the bills!
:-)
In that case, I would recommend just getting it into shape so that it
works best for you. (But then, that's the way we've e
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:29 AM, David Cole via cmake-developers <
cmake-developers@cmake.org> wrote:
> I would say there are no "gold standard" find modules.
>
> The gold standard is a project config file, like Qt5 has.
>
> From http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/manual/cmake-qt.7.html :
>
> "t
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > Everyone has been really helpful but I don't want to be a pest.
> >
> > Is there a specific find package module that one could point to that
> would
> > be consider the gold standard of getting it right? One with su
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15146
==
Reported By:Soeren Textor
Assigned To:
I would say there are no "gold standard" find modules.
The gold standard is a project config file, like Qt5 has.
From http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/manual/cmake-qt.7.html :
"the Qt 5 libraries are found using "Config-file Packages" shipped with
Qt 5"
Also, search this page for "Conf
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Everyone has been really helpful but I don't want to be a pest.
>
> Is there a specific find package module that one could point to that would
> be consider the gold standard of getting it right? One with sufficient
> complexity (not like the wiki example).
Have you looked
Hi Steve,
2014-09-10 0:32 GMT+02:00 Stephen Kelly :
>
>
> I wonder what a cmake-based buildsystem would look like for a collection of
> executables/targets which should be built for multiple ...
>
I would generalize even more and finish the sentence with "options at once".
This includes Debug/Rel
16 matches
Mail list logo
