The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15221
==
Reported By:Ilya
Assigned To:
===
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:58:58 +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> If anyone is interested, help would be appreciated to get a Contracts
> style build up and running.
> In particular, pointers to documentation on how to perform such builds
> would be appreciated - we'll need to run "make install" for pa
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>> Is build.kde.org now using the release branch of cmake.git instead of the
>>> next branch? When/why did that change?
>>
>> This was changed around about
>> ht
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:59:09 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Trying to bring a bit more attention to this:
>
> Fedora is pushing to have higher resolution icons for the applications. There
> already is CMakeSetup128.png, but these would need to get installed into the
> proper /usr/share/icons/
Trying to bring a bit more attention to this:
Fedora is pushing to have higher resolution icons for the applications. There
already is CMakeSetup128.png, but these would need to get installed into the
proper /usr/share/icons/ hierarchy and named appropriately for the correct
size to be automatical
Am Montag, 27. Oktober 2014, 10:55:50 schrieb Brad King:
> On 10/27/2014 10:41 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> >> if("${_RPM_SPEC_HEADER}" MATCHES "REQUIRES_PRE" OR
> >> "${_RPM_SPEC_HEADER}" MATCHES "REQUIRES_POST")
> >
> > This should really be using STREQUAL and not using dereferences on the
> > l
On 10/27/2014 12:22 PM, Evgeny Kalishenko wrote:
> Little correction:
Revised:
CPackRPM: Support pre(post) install script requirements
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=add4e50d
CPackRPM: Support PREUN and POSTUN requirements
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;
Little correction: the first comment "CPackRPM: Support pre(post) install
scripts" differs from mine "Requires for pre(post) install scripts are
implemented" and can cause misunderstanding. Because "pre(post) install
scripts" are already implemented.
2014-10-27 17:55 GMT+03:00 Brad King :
> On 10
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15220
==
Reported By:Anton Indrawan
Assigned To:
On 10/27/2014 10:41 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
>> if("${_RPM_SPEC_HEADER}" MATCHES "REQUIRES_PRE" OR
>> "${_RPM_SPEC_HEADER}" MATCHES "REQUIRES_POST")
>
> This should really be using STREQUAL and not using dereferences on the
> left hand side.
Thanks. Actually I mentioned that in my first rev
Am 27.10.2014 14:27, schrieb Brad King:
On 10/24/2014 05:46 PM, Evgeny Kalishenko wrote:
Documentation added, authorship fixed, a couple of commits squashed.
Great. Applied and merged for testing:
CPackRPM: Support pre(post) install scripts
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;
On 10/14/2014 12:48 PM, Geoffrey Viola wrote:
> Green Hills MULTI is an IDE for embedded real-time systems.
> http://www.ghs.com/products/MULTI_IDE.html.
> http://www.ghs.com/products/rtos/integrity.html.
Thanks for the explanation.
> I took a look at CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT. It is similar to GHS_OS_DI
On 10/24/2014 05:46 PM, Evgeny Kalishenko wrote:
> Documentation added, authorship fixed, a couple of commits squashed.
Great. Applied and merged for testing:
CPackRPM: Support pre(post) install scripts
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=7d049e7c
CPackRPM: Support PREUN and P
On 10/24/2014 09:21 AM, Pascal Bach wrote:
> ---
> Tests/CMakeLists.txt | 46 +-
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks, applied:
Tests: Run Tutorial steps 1-4 as tests for Windows CE
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdi
- Forwarded message from Ben Cooksley -
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 11:50:45 +1300
From: Ben Cooksley
To: Ben Boeckel
Subject: Re: [bcooks...@kde.org: Re: [cmake-developers] Fwd: Re: Severe
behavioural change regressions in release branch]
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Ben Boecke
15 matches
Mail list logo
