On 05/21/2014 02:43 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
FindQt4 already only searches QT_BINARY_DIR for the other tools, and that is
all this patch is about.
Okay, I've revised the commit message a bit:
FindQt[34]: Prefer matching versioned tool names
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Clinton, Stephen,
inspired by what OpenBSD currently does downstream I did a patch that
always searches for the plain executable names (like moc) after all
versioned executable names (e.g. moc4) have been tried.
I recall discussion about this kind of thing before, but
Brad King wrote:
On 05/21/2014 09:18 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I recall discussion about this kind of thing before, but I think
relating to qmake-qt4 and other versioned names.
Currently qmake is preferred over qmake-qt4, but I do not know
why.
I found what I was remembering/referring to
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:50:42 AM Brad King wrote:
On 05/21/2014 09:18 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I recall discussion about this kind of thing before, but I think
relating to qmake-qt4 and other versioned names.
Currently qmake is preferred over qmake-qt4, but I do not know
why.
On 05/21/2014 11:21 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I found what I was remembering/referring to here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.programming.tools.cmake.devel/6313/focus=6314
[snip]
On 05/21/2014 11:24 AM, Clinton Stimpson wrote:
Should we change FindQt4.cmake to loop over paths first,
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2014, 09:24:34 schrieb Clinton Stimpson:
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:50:42 AM Brad King wrote:
On 05/21/2014 09:18 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I recall discussion about this kind of thing before, but I think
relating to qmake-qt4 and other versioned names.
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 05:53:16 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Clinton, Stephen,
inspired by what OpenBSD currently does downstream I did a patch that always
searches for the plain executable names (like moc) after all versioned
executable names (e.g. moc4) have been tried. Since those tools are
