Re: [cmake-developers] Security in CMake

Hi Egor, On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Egor Pugin wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on a package manager based on cmake. Please rethink that approach. Your package manager should support CMake. It should not be based on it. Your design will be safer and more flexible.

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Setup/tear down steps for CTest

Cheeky way to get me more involved in contributing, but okay, I'll bite. ;) Switching discussion to the dev list. So how would you want the feature to work? I'd suggest an initial set of requirements something like the following: - Need to support the ability to define multiple setup and/or

Re: [cmake-developers] Unix makefile: concurrent build configurations

Hi Steve! On Do, 2016-08-18 at 15:37 -0500, Steve Lorimer wrote: > New to this list, so apologies if it's been discussed before. > > I'd like to know why it's not possible to have both debug and release mode > builds configured at the same time for Unix makefiles? You can have an arbitrary

Re: [cmake-developers] Security in CMake

Hi Egor, Is this intended to run on Linux? If so, I think you're FAR better off leveraging an existing security framework like SELinux, since it's actually designed from the ground up to enforce these types of controls. You could define a label that you place on the executables run by the

Re: [cmake-developers] Security in CMake

Hi Chuck, > Is this intended to run on Linux? Yes. And thanks for the pointing out to SELinux. I'll add it to my checklist. --- The system is on very early stages now, so its parts are changing rapidly and I'm able to consider different approaches to its subsystems (including security). But I