Re: [cmake-developers] Automatic project generation with Visual Studio generators

2016-09-16 Thread Yves Frederix
Hi Brad, > For `cmake --build` we already need to detect the generator used > for the build tree in order to ask it to construct the appropriate > command line. For the VS generator we could directly run the same > check that ZERO_CHECK would run in order to decide whether to regen > the build

Re: [cmake-developers] CodeLite generator enhancement(s)

2016-09-16 Thread Minze Zwerver
I can't commit to the gitlab , it says something regarding no disk space. $ git push Counting objects: 5, done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done. Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 2.36 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 5 (delta 4), reused 0 (delta 0) remote:

Re: [cmake-developers] Debug through config/gen inside Visual Studio

2016-09-16 Thread Mate Nagy-Egri via cmake-developers
Thank you Brad. I took the aggressive way and completely wiped the environment inside the debugged process. For those anyone wishing to do something similar, here’s what I’ve done: I wrote a PowerShell oneliner: gci Env: | foreach { $_.Name + "=" + $_.Value } | Out-File -FilePath

Re: [cmake-developers] Debug through config/gen inside Visual Studio

2016-09-16 Thread Brad King
On 09/16/2016 06:32 AM, csiga.b...@aol.com wrote: > Now it’s only up to me to understand the entire process of Makefile > generation. > Global/Local Generators, LocalMakeFileGenerator3 (does 3 correspond to the > third layer of makefiles? If yes, where is 2?) The 3 is the third generation of

Re: [cmake-developers] Automatic project generation with Visual Studio generators

2016-09-16 Thread Brad King
On 09/16/2016 03:37 AM, Yves Frederix wrote: > This would work, but it would make all builds using 'cmake --build' > more verbose as before actually starting the msbuild-build, this would > always print an often large number of lines like: > > CMake does not need to re-run because