-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, David O'Dwyer wrote:
> Pls feel free to post it, thanks
>> Haven't gotten an easy place to post it at this moment, so if you'd
>>>my original post on this subject and some of the replies, I have put
>>>together a quick diagr
>
To: "André Milton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [cms-list] LCMS, LMS's & CMS's
> Have being quiet for a few days, busy busy busy but in relation to
>
ionality and
iii) Interoperability with other corporate systems (e.g. HR Management)
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "André Milton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David O'Dwyer"
Peter,
> Given the competitive nature of the CMS server space I would
> be surprised to see a lot of server-server interoperability
> in the near future.
>>>Agreed. But maybe Open Source products can develop/adopt standards.
That
>>>might put pressure on the commercial companies.
I have been am
We (Red Hat) are tracking JSR 170:
http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=170
"This API proposes that content repositories have a dedicated, standard
way of interaction with applications that deal with content. This API
will focus on transactional read/write access, binary content (stream
operati
> Given the competitive nature of the CMS server space I would
> be surprised to see a lot of server-server interoperability
> in the near future.
Agreed. But maybe Open Source products can develop/adopt standards. That
might put pressure on the commercial companies.
Peter
--
http://cms-list.org/
Avi wrote:
> The Open Source CMS people are very interested in
> interoperability. They were talking about it a lot at
> OSCOM last year, and you should definitely look at their
> work before going on.
We participated in the OSCOM conference in Berkeley last
year. It was decided that browser(clie
At 11:58 AM + 1/27/03, David O'Dwyer wrote:
ii) Why haven't CMS vendors come out with interoperability standards as
well? It probably fair to say that many (most?) are still using proprietary
approaches.
The Open Source CMS people are very interested in interoperability.
They were talking
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David O'Dwyer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:26 PM
Subject: RE: [cms-list] LCMS, LMS's & CMS's
We've ventured pretty heavily into this space over the last 18 months, and
must say that I tend to agree with
Sent by:cc:
cms-list-admin@cm Subject: RE: [cms-list] LCMS, LMS's &
CMS's
Basically, SCORM means two things for course developers. First, there is a
Javascript API that let's you communicate with the server. You call
functions like LMSInitialize()/LMSFinish() to tell the server the student
has started/ended the course, and LMSSetValue()/LMSGetValue() to set and
retrie
ot;'André Milton'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'David O'Dwyer'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 3:40 PM
Subject: RE: [cms-list] LCMS, LMS's & CMS's
> (argh...I hate Outlook. Sent message be
(argh...I hate Outlook. Sent message before finishing...sorry...)
> We in the CMS
> space should just engulf the eLearning technologies like a big amoeba.
> Anyone want to help me define a new eLearning standard? Hehe...
Out of complete curiosity and, perhaps, naivete, what is SCORM and why is
> We in the CMS
> space should just engulf the eLearning technologies like a big amoeba.
> Anyone want to help me define a new eLearning standard? Hehe...
Out of complete curiosity and, perhaps, naivete, what is SCORM and why is
there a 'standard' for a term as abstract and vague as eLearning?
eally help.
I'm off to study a bit more about 'standards'
cheers
- Original Message -
From: "André Milton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David O'Dwyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:
Original Message-
From: David O'Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Charles Reitzel'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cms-list] LCMS, LMS's & CMS's
Michael
What you say is essentially right, but
;Michael Bronder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Charles Reitzel'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'David O'Dwyer'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 9:56 PM
Subject: RE: [cms-list] LCMS, LMS's & CM
This is an inetersting thread for me as I used to be the Director of Content
Management FOR an LMS company...
There is no doubt significant marketing blather that confuses the way we
think about LMS, LCMS, CMS and WCMS... It is possible, however, to
distinguish between them based on the needs they
Hi David,
Most of the service work we've had over the past few years has been in the
eLearning space. In fact, mCubes was an "LCMS" before the term existed and
before LMSs made LCMSs practically useless. I've always tried to make our
system a true CMS and not one that is specific to eLea
Hi David,
Without knowing the details, my guess would be that CMS would not be worth
it for just CBT/LM use. But if you have a CMS anyway, it could be a big
boost to CBT (Computer Based Training) development.
I have some experience with educational content and CMS. Clearly, testing,
scoring,
20 matches
Mail list logo
