On 2021-01-17, at 07:08:54, Rob van der Heij wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 14:48, Kris Buelens wrote:
>
>> Probably there still is a chance that DEBLOCK CMS will complain when the
>> last meaningful record had a trailing blank.
>>
>
> Apparently the halfword 0 is missing, or there wouldn’t
On 2021-01-17, at 07:19:31, Kris Buelens wrote:
>
> Yes indeed, a bit more complicated than something like
> !T: take last!Strip Trailing!F: fanin 1 0 !
> and that's what I wanted to say.
>
If the OP has contol of both the transmitting and receiving protocol,
I suggest:
"pipe strlit
For the cases i tested this evening, i found something that covers my need :
... ! block 80 cms ! pad 80 FF ! punch
pipe reader ! strfind x41 ! substr 2-* ! chop FF ! deblock cms ! ...
X'FF' is used to cut records at the good length. Must not be present in the
input data.
x'00' is used as the fi
CMS pipelines also knows how to handle the case where the end of file
marker is truncated to one byte in the last card.
On 1/17/21 15:08, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 14:48, Kris Buelens wrote:
Probably there still is a chance that DEBLOCK CMS will complain when the
last me
Yes indeed, a bit more complicated than something like
!T: take last!Strip Trailing!F: fanin 1 0 !
and that's what I wanted to say.
Kris Buelens,
--- VM/VSE consultant, Belgium ---
---
Op zo 17 jan. 2021 om 15:09
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 14:48, Kris Buelens wrote:
> Probably there still is a chance that DEBLOCK CMS will complain when the
> last meaningful record had a trailing blank.
>
Apparently the halfword 0 is missing, or there wouldn’t be a problem. You
could strip trailing blanks from the last record
Probably there still is a chance that DEBLOCK CMS will complain when the
last meaningful record had a trailing blank.
Kris Buelens,
--- VM/VSE consultant, Belgium ---
---
Op zo 17 jan. 2021 om 12:37 schreef Alain Benvéniste
I fall into the case where strip trailing the last record only, resolved the
problem.
Thanks
Le 17/01/2021 06:53, « CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List au nom de Kris Buelens
» a écrit :
If you can't change it, I'd then perform a STRIP TRAILING only on the last
record when receiving th
But the one who created the “cms blocked” fornat should terminate with
x to drop the padding. If you have padding on each card, you need to
unravel differently.
Rob
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 at 18:13, Alain Benvéniste wrote:
> Yes. The fact is that i am in the situation where i don’t have the han
