Am 14.04.2018 um 03:49 schrieb Glenn Knickerbocker:
> | that: not fanin
How about 'that: fanin 1 0'? No need for 'not'.
Ciao.Mike
--
www.Ok.de - die kostenlose E-Mail Adresse
Ah, Mike.
Glenn wants to avoid a contorted pipeline topology, so what he is doing
is passing the output from FANIN to the *secondary* output of NOT, which
he can then later FANIN where he wants it.
Chances are that this can be accomplished much more easily with IF.
On 04/14/2018 07:57 AM, amphi
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:47:33 +0200, John wrote:
>Chances are that this can be accomplished much more easily with IF.
That helps gather the sidetrack pipelines together--though, with more
than one sidetrack, it can also get touchy keeping the embedded IF-loops
straight. What NOT FANIN lets me do i
