Ah, Mike.

Glenn wants to avoid a contorted pipeline topology, so what he is doing
is passing the output from FANIN to the *secondary* output of NOT, which
he can then later FANIN where he wants it.

Chances are that this can be accomplished much more easily with IF.

On 04/14/2018 07:57 AM, amphitr...@ok.de wrote:
Am 14.04.2018 um 03:49 schrieb Glenn Knickerbocker:
     | that: not fanin

How about 'that: fanin 1 0'? No need for 'not'.

www.Ok.de - die kostenlose E-Mail Adresse

Reply via email to