Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-12 Thread Randy Stafford via CnC-List
e reviewed ( that fly spinnaker ) > > > > Michael Brown > Windburn > C 30-1 > > > > > > > From: Randy Stafford <mailto:randal.staff...@icloud.com>> > To: cnc-list mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> > Sent: 6/11/2019 3:13

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-12 Thread Michael Brown via CnC-List
2 sec/mile to 21 sec/mile. All classes were reviewed ( that fly spinnaker ) Michael Brown Windburn C 30-1 From: Randy Stafford To: cnc-list Sent: 6/11/2019 3:13 PM Subject: Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating Thanks y’all for your interesting comments on this. I got my

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread dwight veinot via CnC-List
As i know the C 30 MKI your phrf at 180 is fair. Don’t know about the other boats you typically race against but 180 is good and especially if it includes spin and folding prop. Max headsail use LP150 for this but in light air the boat can easily handle a 160/170 probably with a corresponding

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread Randy Stafford via CnC-List
Thanks y’all for your interesting comments on this. I got my new rating yesterday and it came back 180. The handicapper wrote in the “notes and clarifications” section of my RSA’s PHRF certificate form the following: "There are no comparables listed in US Sailing for this model of boat in the

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread CHARLES SCHEAFFER via CnC-List
gt; earlier note as “local politics.” In my view Edd is correct – corrupt local > politics is probably the biggest factor in rating anomalies. > > > > From: Edd Schillay via CnC-List mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com > > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 4:42 PM > &

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List
Correct (as usual) about sport boats. It’s hard to beat a boat capable of doing sport-boat speeds in moderate to heavy air. From: Dennis C. via CnC-List Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 10:18 AM To: CnClist Cc: Dennis C. Subject: Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating The imperfections of handicap

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread Dennis C. via CnC-List
litics is > probably the biggest factor in rating anomalies. > > *From:* Edd Schillay via CnC-List > *Sent:* Monday, June 10, 2019 4:42 PM > *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com > *Cc:* Edd Schillay > *Subject:* Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating > > Randy, > > As some

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread Richard Bush via CnC-List
Cc: Matthew L. Wolford Sent: Tue, Jun 11, 2019 9:56 am Subject: Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating What Edd refers to as “corruption” I referred to in my earlier note as “local politics.”  In my view Edd is correct – corrupt local politics is probably the biggest factor in rating anomalies. From

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread David Risch via CnC-List
Associates (401) 419-4650 From: CnC-List On Behalf Of Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 9:43 AM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: Matthew L. Wolford Subject: Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating Different PHRF organizations in different parts of the country assign ratings

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List
: Edd Schillay Subject: Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating Randy, As someone who was Commodore of a Western Long Island Sound yacht racing association for over 12 years and who has had access to ratings data from all over the USA, there is, simply, a one-word answer: Corruption First of all

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread Matthew L. Wolford via CnC-List
: dwight veinot via CnC-List Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2019 8:56 AM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: dwight veinot Subject: Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating Most of our best racing fun happens whenever we see another mast on a boat with similar rating to Alianna. These “races” usually take less than

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread dwight veinot via CnC-List
Most of our best racing fun happens whenever we see another mast on a boat with similar rating to Alianna. These “races” usually take less than 15 min to decide who has the edge on any particular tack then we break away to have fun going wherever we want to go. That said we have done hundreds of

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-11 Thread Hoyt, Mike via CnC-List
Hi Randy When comparing boats across different areas make sure you look at other boats in those areas as well. Pacific NW tends to rate most of their fleet 9 – 12 sec/mile slower than most other areas … not just the C 30. Also look at the prevailing wind conditions in the areas. Northern

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-10 Thread Dennis C. via CnC-List
Other than the points Edd makes, some authorities might add/subtract a blanket adjustment to ALL boats in their fleet for prevailing wind conditions. No rationale for it that I can determine. Dennis C. On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 3:26 PM Randy Stafford via CnC-List < cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

Re: Stus-List 30 MK I PHRF Rating

2019-06-10 Thread Edd Schillay via CnC-List
Randy, As someone who was Commodore of a Western Long Island Sound yacht racing association for over 12 years and who has had access to ratings data from all over the USA, there is, simply, a one-word answer: Corruption First of all, the P in PHRF is Performance. So, if there is a a few C 30s