Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

tation is a federal issue and is not open to enforcement or interpretation by the state.”  No legal advice there. From: Bill Bina - gmail via CnC-List Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 12:04 PMTo: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: Bill Bina - gmail Subject: Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v.

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

-List Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 12:04 PM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: Bill Bina - gmail Subject: Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation This is true in all 50 states because it is a FEDERAL law. What the sentence means is that the boat must

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

I meant to add that you’re a good one – definitely a compliment. From: Frederick G Street via CnC-List Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 12:03 PM To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com Cc: Frederick G Street Subject: Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation I’m

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

o: cnc-list <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> Cc: Frederick G Street <f...@postaudio.net> Sent: Wed, Feb 7, 2018 12:04 pm Subject: Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation I’m not sure if that’s a compliment or not… :^) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dicti

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

Fairly good analysis, Matthew As a 30 year regulatory professional, terminology is critical. Documented and registered are two entirely different concepts. USCG "documentation" is a very formal thing. It is analogous to placing the mortgage for your house with a clerk of court. All liens,

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

This is true in all 50 states because it is a FEDERAL law. What the sentence means is that the boat must not display state registration numbers if it is documented. That is what they mean by "identified". This is not to say that states cannot require you to register the boat. They just cannot

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

I’m not sure if that’s a compliment or not… :^) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sea%20lawyer — Fred Fred Street -- Minneapolis S/V Oceanis (1979 C Landfall 38) -- on the hard in Bayfield, WI :^( > On Feb 7, 2018, at

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation Matthew — as the BoatUS article is talking about graphics, I read the line in question below (“vessel may only be identified…”) to mean that the vessel should adhere to either state labeling standards if NOT documented, or federal

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

Matthew — as the BoatUS article is talking about graphics, I read the line in question below (“vessel may only be identified…”) to mean that the vessel should adhere to either state labeling standards if NOT documented, or federal labeling standards if it IS documented. So you should NOT have

Re: Stus-List Recent discussion regarding Federal v. State Boat Documentation

I reviewed the first two bullet points from the BoatUS recital, and at least in PA they are not (or may not) be correct: a.. Vessels may only be identified as either a State Registered Vessel or a Federally Documented Vessel - NOT BOTH. Not true in PA. There is a difference between