this
> string started with questions about the back stay on these boats, I was
> wondering about the set up on the one you're looking at. They seems to
> have been relocate inboard from their original location on the transom.
> I'm curious as to why this was done. Any idea or explan
ve been
>>> relocate inboard from their original location on the transom. I'm curious
>>> as to why this was done. Any idea or explanation given?
>>>
>>> GL with the purchase...I am a huge fan of the 37+/40!
>>>
>>> Tom B
>>>>
idea or
> > > explanation given?
> > >
> > > GL with the purchase...I am a huge fan of the 37+/40!
> > >
> > > Tom B
> > >
> > > > > ----
> >
>
t; Louisville, Kentucky 40220-1462
> 502-584-7255
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Baldridge via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> To: cnc-list <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> Cc: Mark Baldridge <jmbaldri...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wed, Jan 4, 2017 3
am a huge fan of the 37+/40!
>
> Tom B
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:17:34 -0500
> From: Mark Baldridge <jmbaldri...@gmail.com> <jmbaldri...@gmail.com>
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Ba
Wed, Jan 4, 2017 3:21 pm
Subject: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
Tom,
I looked at the boat about when the photos were taken and prior tothe
listing going up. The backstay is currently disconnected whilethe
hydraulics are out being rebuilt. They are
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:17:34 -0500
From: Mark Baldridge <jmbaldri...@gmail.com>
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
Message-ID: <6afc5ca3-ac75-7fc3-a725-64d0a88e0...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/pl
ct: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
Message-ID: <6afc5ca3-ac75-7fc3-a725-64d0a88e0...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
Good luck Bruce!
Our survey is the 10th of January on the 1989 37/40+ out of Fairhope,
A
00 (UTC)
From: Bruce Whitmore <bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net>
To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
Message-ID: <267782307.5706814.1483490977...@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf
000 (UTC)
From: Bruce Whitmore <bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net>
To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
Message-ID: <267782307.5706814.1483490977...@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&q
: Michael Cotton via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Michael Cotton <mpc51...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
I had A '90 37+. Port backstay failed in 20 to 25
I saw Michael's boat, Blue Pearl. A 1990 37+. We detected the failure of
the backstay and were extremely cautious. The sale fell through for a
myriad of other deficiencies. When we inspected the boat we ended up
buying (Sea Hawk a 1989 37+ with the tall rig and wing keel) we inspected
the
30, 2016, at 8:57 AM, cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com wrote:
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:48:18 -0500
>> From: Edd Schillay <e...@schillay.com>
>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>> Subject: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
cnc-list.com wrote:
>
> ---
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:48:18 -0500
> From: Edd Schillay <e...@schillay.com>
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
> Message-ID: <65dcc603-b
ist-requ...@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:05:18 + (UTC)
>> From: Bruce Whitmore <bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net
>> <mailto:bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net>>
>> To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cn
t; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 14:05:18 + (UTC)
> From: Bruce Whitmore <bwhitm...@sbcglobal.net>
> To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> Subject: Stus-List C 37+ Backstay Inspection/Improvements
> Message-ID: <402249788.3745481.1483106718...@mail.ya
Bruce,
Both cockpit lockers on either side of the helm should give you plenty of
access to the backstay attachments. On the starboard side, you may need to pull
out the propane tank.
All the best,
Edd
Edd M. Schillay
Starship Enterprise
C 37+ | Sail No: NCC-1701-B
City Island, NY
Starship
Hello all,
We are interested in the C 37/40s, and saw a comment that the backstay
attachments should be closely inspected. Can anyone advise how to get to the
backside of the backstay attachments? It seemed (albeit based on a brief
check), that accessing them from the cockpit lockers would be
18 matches
Mail list logo
