ry old and baggy and also give me a lot of weather helm.
> I have a racing Kevlar?135 that is good up to 25 kn. 150 is a pain to tack
> in light wind and is only good under 10 kn.
> Pierre Tremblay
> Avalanche #54988
> C&C38-3 WK, hull #76
> De?: Mike Flannery via CnC-List
aggy and also give me a lot of weather helm.
I have a racing Kevlar?135 that is good up to 25 kn. 150 is a pain to tack
in light wind and is only good under 10 kn.
Pierre Tremblay
Avalanche #54988
C&C38-3 WK, hull #76
De?: Mike Flannery via CnC-List
??: "CnC-List@cnc-list.com"
is a pain to tack in light wind
and is only good under 10 kn.
Pierre Tremblay
Avalanche #54988
C&C38-3 WK, hull #76
De : Mike Flannery via CnC-List
À : "CnC-List@cnc-list.com"
Envoyé le : mercredi 3 décembre 2014 19h41
Objet : Stus-List CnC 38-3 Sailing Characteristic
Mike - I'd vote for the 110. If the 38-3 sails anything like an LF38,
that should be fine. I put a 90 on my boat when it was single handing
the SF bay, and kept it on when sailing to Mexico. I'll eventually
replace it with a 110, but don't see the need for more power if not
racing. Even wit
Nemesis
'75 C&C 25 #371
Shearwater Yacht Club
Halifax, NS.
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Mike
Flannery via CnC-List
Sent: December-03-14 20:42
To: CnC-List@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List CnC 38-3 Sailing Characteristics
I recently purch
Furler or no furler?
With limited crew you don't want to have to change sails, especially single
handed.
It is easy to want a larger sail thinking it will be more versatile ("I can
always furl it in.") It's not. A furled 150 is only efficient to about
110, where as a 135 is pretty good down to
I recently purchased a 38-3. Now need to replace headsail. Could use some
input on 110 vs 135 vs 150 use. I'm replacing a135 which rounded us up or
resulted in heavy weather helm with small crew. I also singlehand a lot so I'm
trying to figure out what workd best for me San Diego sailing. A
