t.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List The 40-Footer Named 37+ and the 36-Footer Named 34+
Jim: Should it not be Allegro rather than Allergro?
Rich Knowles
Indigo - C&C LF38
Halifax - Nova Scotia
On 2012-09-28, at 23:46, Jim Bradley
<<mailto:dreamsai...@live.ca>dreamsai...@live.ca> wrote:
opps yup
From: r...@sailpower.ca
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 04:59:32 -0300
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List The 40-Footer Named 37+ and the 36-Footer Named 34+
Jim: Should it not be Allegro rather than Allergro?
Rich Knowles
Indigo - C&C LF38
Halifax - Nova Scotia
gt; Barrie Ont.
>
> Would anyone know how i could get the original copy of this?
>
>
>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 20:54:21 -0400
> From: eric.bau...@gmail.com
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List The 40-Footer Named 37+ and the 36-Footer Named 34+
>
-List The 40-Footer Named 37+ and the 36-Footer Named 34+
Late 80's/early '90's designs, particularly the + models were designed to IMS.
See http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/reviews/review34-36.htm
Eric B
C&C 34/36+
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Bob Moriarty wrote:
I won
Late 80's/early '90's designs, particularly the + models were designed to
IMS.
See http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/reviews/review34-36.htm
Eric B
C&C 34/36+
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Bob Moriarty wrote:
> I wonder if those 80's boats were designed to any sort of rule, as
> long as it wasn'
I wonder if those 80's boats were designed to any sort of rule, as
long as it wasn't IOR.
Bob M
Ox 33-1
Jax, FL
> In the late 80's, C&C wanted to market a set of boats to meet the PHRF rule
___
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cnc
Listers,
One of the biggest "burning questions" that I had for Rob Ball this
past weekend was how/why a 40-foot boat got tagged as a "37" Plus, XL or R and
how/why a 36-foot boat got tagged a "34" Plus, XL or R -- and here is what he
told me:
In the late 80's, C&C wanted to mar