I wanted to be able to re-run spatch on an already patched content.
The use case is to add new function prototypes manually and run spatch
to handle the associated #define automatically.
Thanks for a bit more explanation.
I imagine that you might need to specify more source code as adjustment
However, I fail to assemble those two patches in a single concise one.
How do you think about the following approach?
@Add_before_declaration@
identifier func;
type t;
@@
(
#define func BAR(func)
t func(...);
|
+#define func BAR(func)
t func(...);
)
@Add_before_implementation@
identifier
@Add_before_implementation@
identifier func;
type t;
@@
(
#define func BAR(func)
t func(...)
{ ... }
|
+#define func BAR(func)
t func(...)
{ ... }
)
This doesn't work.
Interesting ...
There is no kind of disjunction that includes a function definition in a
branch.
Was I
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
On 29.10.2014 11:26, Julia Lawall wrote:
I wanted to be able to re-run spatch on an already patched content. The
use case is to add new function prototypes manually and run spatch to
handle the associated #define automatically.
I
On 29.10.2014 12:07, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Jean-Sébastien Pédron wrote:
On 29.10.2014 11:26, Julia Lawall wrote:
I wanted to be able to re-run spatch on an already patched content. The
use case is to add new function prototypes manually and run spatch to
handle the
