Re: [Cocci] Function-like macro with the same name as a typedef

Markus Elfring writes: >>> * How many software implementations use identical type definitions >>> and function-like macros? >> >> I don't know. > > Can it become interesting to find more about such usage patterns out? Rule of thumb: for every user reporting an issue, there are several more suf

Re: [Cocci] Function-like macro with the same name as a typedef

Markus Elfring writes: * spatch seems to have trouble parsing ARMSSE *s = ARMSSE(opaque); where ARMSSE is a typedef, and ARMSSE() is a function-like macro. Yes, I know that's in rather poor taste. >>> >>> I am curious for the safe handling of related software

Re: [Cocci] Function-like macro with the same name as a typedef

Markus Elfring writes: >> * spatch seems to have trouble parsing >> >> ARMSSE *s = ARMSSE(opaque); >> >> where ARMSSE is a typedef, and ARMSSE() is a function-like macro. >> Yes, I know that's in rather poor taste. > > I am curious for the safe handling of related software development cha

[Cocci] Function-like macro with the same name as a typedef -> parse error

I noticed that Coccinelle skips over much of QEMU's hw/arm/armsse.c. I append a minimized test case. Observations: * spatch seems to have trouble parsing ARMSSE *s = ARMSSE(opaque); where ARMSSE is a typedef, and ARMSSE() is a function-like macro. Yes, I know that's in rather poor taste