Re: [C2]: Performance and logging

2001-08-09 Thread giacomo
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > > I know that we had this discussion some time ago, with no real solution, > so I thought: why not start it again? > > Looking at the way logging is performed in cocoon 2, I think this is > not very fast. Here an example: > > > getLogger().de

AW: [C2]: Performance and logging

2001-08-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:36 AM > > To: Cocoon-Dev@Xml. Apache. Org > > Subject: [C2]: Performance and logging > > > > > &g

AW: [C2]: Performance and logging

2001-08-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
> Berin Loritsch wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I know that we had this discussion some time ago, with no real solution, > > so I thought: why not start it again? > > > > Looking at the way logging is performed in cocoon 2, I think this is > > not very fast. Here an example

Re: [C2]: Performance and logging

2001-08-07 Thread Berin Loritsch
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Hi, > > I know that we had this discussion some time ago, with no real solution, > so I thought: why not start it again? > > Looking at the way logging is performed in cocoon 2, I think this is > not very fast. Here an example: > > > getLogger().debug("Creating n

RE: [C2]: Performance and logging

2001-08-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> -Original Message- > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 6:36 AM > To: Cocoon-Dev@Xml. Apache. Org > Subject: [C2]: Performance and logging > > > Hi, > > I know that we had this discussion some time ago,

[C2]: Performance and logging

2001-08-07 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi, I know that we had this discussion some time ago, with no real solution, so I thought: why not start it again? Looking at the way logging is performed in cocoon 2, I think this is not very fast. Here an example: getLogger().debug("Creating new Templates in " + this + " for " + this.input

RE: C2 performance

2001-07-16 Thread Torsten Curdt
> > Guys I was playing a little bit with JMeter and maybe > > I was doing something totally wrong but the result was > > more than disappointing... > > > > I hit our Win2000 + JDK 1.3 + Tomcat 4b3 + C2.1dev installation > > on a PIII 700 with 256MB with 10 threads and a constant delay > > of 1000m

RE: C2 performance

2001-07-14 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
Hola Torsten. > > Thanks, man! > No hay de que.. > Should we move this thread to cocoon-user then? > I'm not subscribed to cocoon-user at this moment and i'm not prepared for 2 high volumen mailing list on my mailbox, sorry , better here :), if we can, or if anyody complaints.. tomcat-user

RE: C2 performance

2001-07-14 Thread Torsten Curdt
ich i'd bet you will not find really :) > > Are you using ab to make the tests? > > Saludos , > Ignacio J. Ortega > > > > -Mensaje original- > > De: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: viernes 13 de julio de 2001 17:53 >

RE: C2 performance

2001-07-13 Thread Ignacio J. Ortega
saje original- > De: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: viernes 13 de julio de 2001 17:53 > Para: Cocoon-Dev > Asunto: C2 performance > > > Guys I was playing a little bit with JMeter and maybe > I was doing something totally wrong but the result was > m

Re: C2 performance

2001-07-13 Thread Donald Ball
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote: > Guys I was playing a little bit with JMeter and maybe > I was doing something totally wrong but the result was > more than disappointing... > > I hit our Win2000 + JDK 1.3 + Tomcat 4b3 + C2.1dev installation > on a PIII 700 with 256MB with 10 threads an

C2 performance

2001-07-13 Thread Torsten Curdt
Guys I was playing a little bit with JMeter and maybe I was doing something totally wrong but the result was more than disappointing... I hit our Win2000 + JDK 1.3 + Tomcat 4b3 + C2.1dev installation on a PIII 700 with 256MB with 10 threads and a constant delay of 1000ms. For http://host:8080/coc