Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Matthew Langham wrote:
>
>
>
>>I discussed this with Sylvain and we both were not sure of the Apache side
>>of things. Perhaps someone can comment on what is "allowed" in the sense of
>>"tolerated". Thanks.
>>
>>
>Now, this said: I personally don't have any prob
I'm not a committer here - but I think this is a excellent way to handle
it...
> Matthew Langham wrote:
>
>> I discussed this with Sylvain and we both were not sure of the Apache
>> side of things. Perhaps someone can comment on what is "allowed" in
>> the sense of "tolerated". Thanks.
>
> Ok, a
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
>
> Now, this said: I personally don't have any problem in having a page
> that lists companies that provide commercial services for Cocoon, as
> long as they deserve it.
I agree here totally, but I see problems in finding out who deserves
it and who not. (There are s
On Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 10:11 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Matthew Langham wrote:
>
>> I discussed this with Sylvain and we both were not sure of the
>> Apache side
>> of things. Perhaps someone can comment on what is "allowed" in
>> the sense of
>> "tolerated". Thanks.
>
> So, I would
Matthew Langham wrote:
> I discussed this with Sylvain and we both were not sure of the Apache side
> of things. Perhaps someone can comment on what is "allowed" in the sense of
> "tolerated". Thanks.
Ok, a few comments from an ASF member.
NOTE: this is *not* official. Only the ASF board can st
