Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2002-01-03 Thread Sylvain Wallez
giacomo a écrit : > > On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > giacomo wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The only drawback is that LogKit complains about categories not > > explicitly declared in logkit.xconf. Maybe LogKit shouldn't be so picky > > about that and just act as a co

Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2002-01-03 Thread giacomo
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > giacomo wrote: > > > > > The only drawback is that LogKit complains about categories not > explicitly declared in logkit.xconf. Maybe LogKit shouldn't be so picky > about that and just act as a configuration front-end to Hierarchy (i.e. >

RE: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2002-01-02 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
D] >Subject: RE: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: >Over-Logging) > > >+1 from me > >Carsten > >> -Original Message- >> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 7:39 PM >> To: [EMAIL P

RE: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2002-01-01 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1 from me Carsten > -Original Message- > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 7:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: > Over-Logging) > > > +1

Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2001-12-30 Thread Sylvain Wallez
giacomo wrote: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > >>giacomo wrote: >> >> >> >> >>The only drawback is that LogKit complains about categories not >>explicitly declared in logkit.xconf. Maybe LogKit shouldn't be so picky >>about that and just act as a configuration front

Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2001-12-30 Thread giacomo
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > giacomo wrote: > > > > > The only drawback is that LogKit complains about categories not > explicitly declared in logkit.xconf. Maybe LogKit shouldn't be so picky > about that and just act as a configuration front-end to Hierarchy (i.e. >

Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2001-12-30 Thread Sylvain Wallez
giacomo wrote: The only drawback is that LogKit complains about categories not explicitly declared in logkit.xconf. Maybe LogKit shouldn't be so picky about that and just act as a configuration front-end to Hierarchy (i.e. remove the m_loggers HashMap). >>>This can be fixe

Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2001-12-29 Thread giacomo
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > giacomo a écrit : > > > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > > > > > > Torsten Curdt a écrit : > > > > > > > > > Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the >conclusion that DEBUG > > > > > simply outputs too

Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2001-12-28 Thread Bernhard Huber
+1 from me. Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >giacomo a écrit : > >>On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: >> >>>Torsten Curdt a écrit : >>> >Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion >that DEBUG >simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request,

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread Bernhard Huber
> Many people complain about that with me ;P > > Seriously though, it has been ingrained in me that if you "assume" you > make > an ASS out of U and ME. I work with alot of developers that have English > as a second language, so I tend to be over-explicit to remove all > doubt as > to what I am

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread David Crossley
Berin Loritsch wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Berin Loritsch a écrit : > >>Maybe. The whole system is being redone, taking in lessons learned, and > >>applying cleaner implementations. That will assist in the process. BTW, > >>it isn't LogKit that is picky, it is the LogKitManager as LogKit

Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2001-12-28 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. Thanks, dims --- Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > > > >>>We can add more categories : in my sitemaps, each component has a > >>>different category (using the "logger" attribute) : > >>> > >>>sitemap.generator.file > >>>sitemap.generator.direc

Re: [vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2001-12-28 Thread Berin Loritsch
Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >>>We can add more categories : in my sitemaps, each component has a >>>different category (using the "logger" attribute) : >>> >>>sitemap.generator.file >>>sitemap.generator.directory >>>sitemap.generator.serverpages >>>sitemap.transformer.xslt >>>sitemap.transformer.lo

[vote] Finer-grained logging categories (was: Re: Over-Logging)

2001-12-28 Thread Sylvain Wallez
giacomo a écrit : > > On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > > > Torsten Curdt a écrit : > > > > > > > Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion >that DEBUG > > > > simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request, Cocoon outputs 23 >pa

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread giacomo
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Torsten Curdt a écrit : > > > > > Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion >that DEBUG > > > simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request, Cocoon outputs 23 >pages of > > > log messages equivalent

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread Berin Loritsch
Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > Berin Loritsch a écrit : >>Maybe. The whole system is being redone, taking in lessons learned, and >>applying cleaner implementations. That will assist in the process. BTW, >>it isn't LogKit that is picky, it is the LogKitManager as LogKit has no >>knowledge of read

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Berin Loritsch a écrit : > > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > Torsten Curdt a écrit : > > > >>>Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion >that DEBUG > >>>simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request, Cocoon outputs 23 >pages of > >>>log messages e

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread Berin Loritsch
Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Torsten Curdt a écrit : > >>>Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion that >DEBUG >>>simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request, Cocoon outputs 23 pages >of >>>log messages equivalent to 57k on the drive. >>> >>>My fr

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Torsten Curdt a écrit : > > > Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion >that DEBUG > > simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request, Cocoon outputs 23 pages >of > > log messages equivalent to 57k on the drive. > > > > My friends, this is too m

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread giacomo
On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion that >DEBUG > simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request, Cocoon outputs 23 pages of > log messages equivalent to 57k on the drive. > > My friends, this is t

Re: Over-Logging

2001-12-28 Thread Torsten Curdt
> Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion that >DEBUG > simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request, Cocoon outputs 23 pages of > log messages equivalent to 57k on the drive. > > My friends, this is too much. Logging should have a purpose, an

Over-Logging

2001-12-27 Thread Berin Loritsch
Now that I am back working with Cocoon, I have recently come to the conclusion that DEBUG simply outputs too much information. For one (1) request, Cocoon outputs 23 pages of log messages equivalent to 57k on the drive. My friends, this is too much. Logging should have a purpose, and not simpl