Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Konstantin Piroumian wrote: >>From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >>+1 >> >> >>I'm also a bit confused by the cocoon: >>proto. Isn't there more to it than just forward? >> Nothing more ! >>The parameters to forward are request attributes correct? >>You can't add request parameters

RE: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Konstantin Piroumian
> From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > +1 > > > I'm also a bit confused by the cocoon: > proto. Isn't there more to it than just forward? > > The parameters to forward are request attributes correct? > You can't add request parameters with server side forward. I've been thinkin

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Stuart Roebuck
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 11:59 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> See this simple case: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> As you see there is no need for a flowmap and there is no need for a >> resource usage. > > In this case, there is no need for an

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Ivelin Ivanov
+1 I'm also a bit confused by the cocoon: proto. Isn't there more to it than just forward? The parameters to forward are request attributes correct? You can't add request parameters with server side forward. - Original Message - From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[E

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Konstantin Piroumian wrote: >Hi, team! > >I'd like to propose to add a node to sitemap. >Behavior should be the same as . >As redirect and forward are absolutely different in servlet environment then >it would be better to have separate elements for them. I'd leave > for real redirects (with 302

RE: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Morrison, John
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > You like declarative? Then try to make a charting stylesheet > > > in xsl like > > > brother John did, and we will see if you still like it ;-P > > > > Hey! Don't bring me into this! ;) >

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > You like declarative? Then try to make a charting stylesheet > > in xsl like > > brother John did, and we will see if you still like it ;-P > > Hey! Don't bring me into this! ;) > > I enjoyed doing those xslt's :) :-) I've also seen 3D charts done

RE: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Konstantin Piroumian
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Ok, then can someone please explain me what resources are for? > > > > Is it possible to use actions inside of a resource? If no

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > See this simple case: > > > > > > > As you see there is no need for a flowmap and there is no need for a > resource usage. In this case, there is no need for an internal redirect. All web servers usually redirect the browser in this case.

RE: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Morrison, John
> You like declarative? Then try to make a charting stylesheet > in xsl like > brother John did, and we will see if you still like it ;-P Hey! Don't bring me into this! ;) I enjoyed doing those xslt's :) BTW - I can see the use of internal redirects and the portal code makes *heavy* use of it

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Ok, then can someone please explain me what resources are for? > > Is it possible to use actions inside of a resource? If no then with > you'll have that possibilty. If yes, then I don't

RE: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Konstantin Piroumian
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > The flowmap will eliminate needs for redirects, like whiles > an

RE: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Konstantin Piroumian
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose to add a node > > > to sitemap.

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose to add a node > > to sitemap. > > > Behavior should be the same as > uri="cocoon:/..." />. > > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Stuart Roebuck
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:17 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >> I'd like to propose to add a node to sitemap. >> Behavior should be the same as . > > What's different from current map:call ? > > > > I can see value in a more explicit facility for redirecting

RE: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Konstantin Piroumian
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I'd like to propose to add a node > to sitemap. > > Behavior should be the same as uri="cocoon:/..." />. > > What's different from current map:call ? > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward

2002-04-09 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'd like to propose to add a node to sitemap. > Behavior should be the same as . What's different from current map:call ? -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, s