Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-27 Thread Jeremy Quinn
On Sunday, April 21, 2002, at 02:46 , Robert Koberg wrote: > Or, how about something like Double Choco Latte > (http://dcl.sourceforge.com) or some other project management > tool (that has bug tracking)? It is still in beta. We use it > internally and it works well, but it is PHP... Is there

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-22 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
Hi, DS>Oh, I'm really sorry. I certainly didn't mean to do this. I DS>wanted stay general in my inventory/assessment, so I grouped DS>a lot of documents together. My approach was probably overly DS>general, and my apologies to anyone who feels I DS>overlooked/underestimated their contribution. An

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire --- (user how-tos)

2002-04-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Friday 19 April 2002 22:05, Diana Shannon wrote: >. . . > Learning to use C2 (introductory/intermediate/advanced users) >- conceptual, big-picture pieces >- FAQs >- tutorials (multiple levels) >- guides to additional components >o manual >o learner's roadmaps >o glos

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-22 Thread Diana Shannon
Gerhard: > > Hi, > *snief* you forgot to find a place for my recently submitted performance > tips. Oh, I'm really sorry. I certainly didn't mean to do this. I wanted stay general in my inventory/assessment, so I grouped a lot of documents together. My approach was probably overly general, an

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-22 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
I'm fine with that as long as documentation-related posts to cocoon-dev are never considered off-topic. The developers should not get to pack themselves into an ivory tower never to have to worry about documentation ever again. Sometimes creating a new list encourages traffic, sometimes disc

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-22 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
Hi, *snief* you forgot to find a place for my recently submitted performance tips. But I'm sure you only overseen it ;-) Greets ~Gerhard - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-22 Thread Diana Shannon
Andrew: >> >> 3. Form documentation team. High priority. > > elaborate what you mean by this... Sorry this wasn't clear. A number of people have emailed me privately with offers of help. I want to make sure they have what they need (information, templates, editorial/review support) to be able

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-22 Thread David Crossley
Diana Shannon wrote: > - > 1. Assessing needs > Note the meaning of following symbols: >+ existing documentation meets this need >- existing documentation partially meets this need >o no documentation currently meets this need > > Evaluating C2 (new users, managers, admini

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-21 Thread herrie
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Diana Shannon wrote: > > - > > 1. Assessing needs > > How-tos > - How to use built-in actions (different how-tos) > - How to design your own action/generator/transformer, etc. (multiple > how-tos with concrete example) As it happens, I've just completed writing a tut

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-21 Thread Bernhard Huber
> Reference Guides > - Guide for all built-in pipeline components with descriptions of > parameters (I know this exists, but it's incomplete. I know some of > this info is in the API, but it's inefficient for users to find.) > - Guide for all built-in logicsheet tags (just tags and their meaning

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-21 Thread Robert Koberg
Good Morning Diana, Diana Shannon wrote: > > Focus efforts on incremental development of useful, updated content > that users need *now*. If this effort results in enough content -- in > the future -- for a comprehensive manual, great. However, at the > present time, IMHO we should leave the

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-21 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Diana Shannon wrote: >> - >> 1. Assessing needs > > > Here's what my document to-do list would look like. I realize some of > this content already exists (within examples, cocoon.xconf, > sitemap.xmap, the APIs, etc.). The proposed documentation structure > would help to make this cont

Re: [input needed] --- documentation questionnaire ---

2002-04-21 Thread Diana Shannon
> - > 1. Assessing needs Here's what my document to-do list would look like. I realize some of this content already exists (within examples, cocoon.xconf, sitemap.xmap, the APIs, etc.). The proposed documentation structure would help to make this content more accessible. Tutorial - A