At 12:44 pm -0500 24/2/02, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>> At 3:36 pm -0500 23/2/02, Peter Royal wrote:
>> >On Saturday 23 February 2002 09:57 am, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>> >> One issue I KNOW exists.
>> >> If you send out an HTML form, with XML tags insi
On Sunday 24 February 2002 05:05 am, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> At 3:36 pm -0500 23/2/02, Peter Royal wrote:
> >On Saturday 23 February 2002 09:57 am, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> >> One issue I KNOW exists.
> >> If you send out an HTML form, with XML tags inside a form field that
> >> resemble HTML tags (, ,
> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> At 3:36 pm -0500 23/2/02, Peter Royal wrote:
> >On Saturday 23 February 2002 09:57 am, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> >> One issue I KNOW exists.
> >> If you send out an HTML form, with XML tags inside a form field
that
> >> resemble HTML tags (, , etc.)
At 3:36 pm -0500 23/2/02, Peter Royal wrote:
>On Saturday 23 February 2002 09:57 am, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>> One issue I KNOW exists.
>> If you send out an HTML form, with XML tags inside a form field that
>> resemble HTML tags (, , etc.) then the HTMLSerializer breaks
>> them!!!
>
>Use XHTML. We'r
On Saturday 23 February 2002 09:57 am, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> One issue I KNOW exists.
> If you send out an HTML form, with XML tags inside a form field that
> resemble HTML tags (, , etc.) then the HTMLSerializer breaks
> them!!!
Use XHTML. We're sending that to both Mozilla-based browsers and IE
At 11:27 am +0100 23/2/02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I am almost ready to commit a new version of FileWritingTransformer.
>>
>> There is a new experimental/demo file-editor called .
>
>upload upload upload :)
It's done, I was not subscribed to cvs list wi
- Original Message -
From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > What I cannot work out is, would defective XML markup, passed down the
> > stream as character data, then transformed into a form to re-edit and
fix,
> > be real tags or would they be Entities by then?
>
> Gosh, Je
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am almost ready to commit a new version of FileWritingTransformer.
>
> There is a new experimental/demo file-editor called .
upload upload upload :)
> I updated the transformer to try and stop it overwriting files when there
> is an error. I now write i
At 12:52 pm +0100 19/2/02, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm not sure, but I think windows needs two slashes after "file:" - the
>backslashes are not required.
>
>How do you construct the whole file URI? Do you use the SourceResolver?
>If you for example use the relative path "mount/editor/docs/
Hi,
I'm not sure, but I think windows needs two slashes after "file:" - the
backslashes are not required.
How do you construct the whole file URI? Do you use the SourceResolver?
If you for example use the relative path "mount/editor/docs/test1.xml" and
put it into the SourceResolver.resolve meth
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
>>>Question 1#: how hard would it be do to
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Currently there is a load of code in FileWritingTransformer that is File
>>specific, I check for a 'file:' prefix on resolved sources.
>>
>>I think we would want Sylvain
Bert Van Kets wrote:
> I can't get the FileWriterTransformer to work in Win2K. Cocoon is
> giving me an Internal Server Error: _Could not read resource
> file:/C:/tomcat/webapps/cocoon/mount/editor/docs/test1.xml
> _.
The amount of slashes (file:/ vs. file://) might be of relevance; have
yo
I can't get the FileWriterTransformer to work in Win2K. Cocoon is
giving me an Internal Server Error: Could not read resource
file:/C:/tomcat/webapps/cocoon/mount/editor/docs/test1.xml.
The same Cocoon configuration works fine in SuSE Linux 7.3.
Does anybody have any idea what could be wrong?
Ber
At 12:12 pm +0100 18/2/02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>> Whatever generates the 'child' document (the part of the 'parent' document
>> that gets written out) will issue the appropriate StartPrefixMapping calls
>> for that Fragment, no?
>>
>> Therefore it is the responsibility of
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> On Saturday 16 February 2002 14:27, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> >. . .
> > I suspect I ought to be Serialising into a temporary file and
> > replacing the original only after everything has worked.
>
> Makes sense, AFAIK renaming a file is an atomic operation on all
> cu
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> >I would filter them out before saving and forget about it.
>
> I think there could be a simple solution .
>
> At the moment, I cache StartPrefixMapping calls from the 'parent' document,
> so I can send them to the 'child' document when it starts up.
>
> I think this
On Monday 18 February 2002 11:37, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>. . .
> While I am working out how to do this the right way, I'll fix the
> Transformer so that it writes to a temporary file as above, and if
> another person attempts to simultaneously overwrite, I can just throw
> an Excpetion and have them
At 8:15 am +0100 18/2/02, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Thanks for your reply, Bertrand,
>On Saturday 16 February 2002 14:27, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>>. . .
>> I suspect I ought to be Serialising into a temporary file and
>> replacing the original only after everything has worked.
>
>Makes sense, AFAI
On Saturday 16 February 2002 14:27, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>. . .
> I suspect I ought to be Serialising into a temporary file and
> replacing the original only after everything has worked.
Makes sense, AFAIK renaming a file is an atomic operation on all
current OSes.
>. . .
> How do I block the pr
At 6:44 pm + 15/2/02, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>At 6:24 pm +0100 15/2/02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>>Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>Currently there is a load of code in FileWritingTransformer that is File
>specific.
I just though of a potential problem with my file handling code.
Maybe someone could advis
At 11:53 pm +0100 15/2/02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>> Two other issues
>>
>> I need to make sure the Transformer does not emit more than one 'copy' of
>> each namespace prefix, currently multiple sources (FileGenerator &
>> XInclude) with multiple copies of the same n
At 11:53 pm +0100 15/2/02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
>> >Question 1#: how hard would it be do to
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Currently there is a load of code in FileWritingTransformer that is File
>> specific, I check for a 'file:' prefix on resolved sour
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> >Question 1#: how hard would it be do to
> >
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
>
> Currently there is a load of code in FileWritingTransformer that is File
> specific, I check for a 'file:' prefix on resolved sources.
>
> I think we would want Sylvain's WriteableSource would
> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> At 2:00 pm -0500 15/2/02, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> >> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> >
> >
> >> >Question #2: do you check if the element includes
*one*
> >> >and
> >> >only *one* nested element? If not, we could end up wit
At 2:00 pm -0500 15/2/02, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
>
>> >Question #2: do you check if the element includes *one*
>and
>> >only *one* nested element? If not, we could end up with problems
>later
>> >on.
>
>Wait, why such a limitation? What if you
> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Question #2: do you check if the element includes *one*
and
> >only *one* nested element? If not, we could end up with problems
later
> >on.
Wait, why such a limitation? What if you want to write few files, not
one? The result modes of the tr
At 6:24 pm +0100 15/2/02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I reckon I have the FileWritingTransformer and some samples ready for
>> others to test.
>>
>> Would anyone have any objection to me adding them to the scratchpad?
>
>Absolutely not! I would use it instan
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I reckon I have the FileWritingTransformer and some samples ready for
> others to test.
>
> Would anyone have any objection to me adding them to the scratchpad?
Absolutely not! I would use it instanstly!
> I have chosen an Apache Namespace for it:
>
>
> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Dear All,
>
> I reckon I have the FileWritingTransformer and some samples ready for
> others to test.
>
> Would anyone have any objection to me adding them to the scratchpad?
>
> I have chosen an Apache Namespace for it:
>
> xmlns:xfwt
29 matches
Mail list logo
