> From: Mats Norén [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Re: Cocoon Form binding and validation [was: RE: SchemoX forms]
> The SaxErrorHandler can, to the best of my knowledge, NOT provide you with
> the XPath location of the bad element,
> a quick workaround is to implement
o a productive outcome of our discussion.
Best regards,
Ivelin
- Original Message -
From: "Kohsuke Kawaguchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ivelin Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:09 PM
Subject:
2002 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: Cocoon Form binding and validation [was: RE: SchemoX forms]
> The SaxErrorHandler can, to the best of my knowledge, NOT provide you with
> the XPath location of the bad element,
> a quick workaround is to implement a tag tracking Stack in the
errorhandler.
> I buil
> I've submitted a few questions on the JARV message board, but maybe you
can
> answer quicker.
Not sure about that ;)
>
> Does the the SaxErrorHandler interface provide the XPath location of the
bad
> elelement, or it can only report the
> file, line and column where the failure occured.
The S
> I've submitted a few questions on the JARV message board, but maybe you
can
> answer quicker.
Not sure about that ;)
>
> Does the the SaxErrorHandler interface provide the XPath location of the
bad
> elelement, or it can only report the
> file, line and column where the failure occured.
The S
ect: Re: Cocoon Form binding and validation [was: RE: SchemoX forms]
Thanks for the pointer, good piece of work.
If possible I would surely like to leverage working solutions.
I've submitted a few questions on the JARV message board, but maybe you can
answer quicker.
Does the the SaxErrorHandler
Form binding and validation [was: RE: SchemoX forms]
I´ve been following your thread about form validation and I must say it
looks promising.
Keep up the good work! :)
I'm wondering if you thought about using the JARV API for the pluggable
validators?
http://iso-relax.sourceforge.net/JARV/JARV
I´ve been following your thread about form validation and I must say it
looks promising.
Keep up the good work! :)
I'm wondering if you thought about using the JARV API for the pluggable
validators?
http://iso-relax.sourceforge.net/JARV/JARV.html
In our application we choose to use the Sun MSV fo
> Sure. Options are good. I'll provide the schematron schema for the demo
> wizard, with your input of course.
great!
> > by "user" you mean developers, right ;)
>
> Now you know I'm dealing with user requirements too much lately ... ;)
;)
> I'll look more carefully at your code and will
Torsten,
> > However we need to pick one validation language for the wizard.
> > You know my vote:) What do you guys think, which one should we use?
>
> Well, true for the first place... I like add different version later.
> So people see what is possible
Sure. Options are good. I'll provide th
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>
> Torsten,
>
> I looked at your README and code.
> Man we're so much on the same page.
> Let's turn it over !!!
good to hear :))
> Did you have a chance to look at my latest stuff?
Yes... but only a brief look - looks good though
> Is there a way we
Torsten,
I looked at your README and code.
Man we're so much on the same page.
Let's turn it over !!!
Did you have a chance to look at my latest stuff?
Is there a way we can get my source in scratch pad so that more people can
play with it.
Right now only a few of us that follow the thread kno
Konstantin,
How do you manage to be working on so many things, pal?
I could only focus efficiently at one thing at a time.
Definitely want to put some work in Forrest and the CallBackHandlers, but to
be sure that the Form Handling gets done, I can only focus on it.
> Not at all. Thank you for y
> Done. Hm... It seems that you and Ivelin are doing the same thing but in
> quite different ways ;)
> Isn't it time to come a consensus in interfaces, sitemap structure etc.?
Yes... that's true - I had almost finished my proof-of-concept prototype
when Ivelin spoke up...
> Btw, I've found my ow
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> From: "Piroumian, Konstantin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >
> > > So might also want to try the examples...
> >
> > Yes, sure, but I'd prefer to have them running from Cocoon
> samples page
>
From: "Piroumian, Konstantin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > So might also want to try the examples...
>
> Yes, sure, but I'd prefer to have them running from Cocoon samples page
(see
> http://localhost:8080/cocoon/mount/ - there is a link to 'prece
> From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
>
> > > As long as your stylesheet takes an instance (inserted in
> the XForms
> > > document from a JavaBean or DOM node through
> > > CastorTransformer or a flat XML
> > > file) and renders HTML Form with element names which
> > > corresp
> > As long as your stylesheet takes an instance (inserted in the XForms
> > document from a JavaBean or DOM node through
> > CastorTransformer or a flat XML
> > file) and renders HTML Form with element names which
> > correspond to the XPath
> > locations of the instance elements, then I think
> From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cocoon Form binding and validation [was: RE:
> SchemoX forms]
>
> Konstantin,
>
>
> Thanks for responding. I know you're knee
Konstantin,
Thanks for responding. I know you're knee deep in forrest work !
> > Since the all XML/XSL form validation and presentation is
> > already available
> > and somewhat useful, as Jeremy demoed,
> > I would now like to do the all Java extreme.
> > I got the Schematron validation of J
> From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Konstantin,
>
> Since the all XML/XSL form validation and presentation is
> already available
> and somewhat useful, as Jeremy demoed,
> I would now like to do the all Java extreme.
> I got the Schematron validation of JavaBeans/DOM working
Konstantin,
Since the all XML/XSL form validation and presentation is already available
and somewhat useful, as Jeremy demoed,
I would now like to do the all Java extreme.
I got the Schematron validation of JavaBeans/DOM working with XSL templates,
but I decided to implement an even more efficien
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SchemoX forms
>
>
> Konstantin,
>
> > That's cool! Waiting result with impatience. If Cocoon wil
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
> Torsten,
>
> >
> > After rethinking the whole stuff I have to admit I don't like the
> > phase concept :(
> >
> > For SoC the phases should *not* be in the preceptor. The preceptor should
> > not have to change if you move a textbox from one view into a
Torsten,
>
> After rethinking the whole stuff I have to admit I don't like the
> phase concept :(
>
> For SoC the phases should *not* be in the preceptor. The preceptor should
> not have to change if you move a textbox from one view into another.
> That's not a clean approach...
I just thought t
Konstantin,
> That's cool! Waiting result with impatience. If Cocoon will have all
> features needed for a form-based web application then a lot of people will
> move from Struts to Cocoon. And I hope to move all our projects to Cocoon.
Word up.
If good Form handling was available, I would have
- Original Message -
From: "Torsten Curdt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:23 AM
Subject: RE: SchemoX forms
> > > To give everyone a heads up, I am now working on Java API for
> > > XML Schema and S
> > It is one of the projects that I looked at initially along
> > with Chiba and ExForms. Appears that Schemox has been frozen
> > back in 2000. Although it was presented on the Cocoon dev
> > list an integrated solution never saw the light of day.
>
> Yes, there is no any activity at Infozone no
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:26 AM
> To: Nicola Ken Barozzi
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SchemoX forms
>
>
>
> It is one of the projects that I looked at initially a
arozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:43 PM
Subject: SchemoX forms
> It just might help a bit with forms stuff:
>
> http://www.infozone-group.org/schemoxDocs/html/ctwo.html
>
> --
> Nicola Ken Barozzi
It just might help a bit with forms stuff:
http://www.infozone-group.org/schemoxDocs/html/ctwo.html
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
--
31 matches
Mail list logo
