Now that's VERY INTERESTING. There could easily be hundreds of such voilations alreadyexisting, andit wouldn'tbe obvious or easily observable. Iguess the process is we just wait until a patent holder has an objection.
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steven Noels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[let's keep
Ted:
Can you give us a couple examples, without exposing anything sensitive, of previous litigation and or attempted litigation against Apache open source members?
It would be very helpful to have some understanding of how and why this can come about so that we can adopt a preventive posture.
[let's keep this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] please]
Steven Punte wrote:
To date, my understanding of open source software is that it expresses
no warranty at all. I'm unclear on what basis someone would be held
libel in a legal action.
Patent infringements?
/Steven
--
Steven Noels
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
What I like most about such a proposal is that it is completely up to
the commiters to decide whether they want opt in or opt out.
What do others think?
It continues to sound reasonable to me, but I'd personally like to see
the Jakarta brand continue. Not sure how to
What I like most about such a proposal is that it is completely up to
the commiters to decide whether they want opt in or opt out.
What do others think?
It continues to sound reasonable to me, but I'd personally like to see
the Jakarta brand continue. Not sure how to *do* that...
I don't
Hello all,
At ApacheCon I had a number of great discussions
with people from all over the ASF. One
of the many topics ofdiscussion
wasaround the organization of the ASF. I'm going to try
to
summarize the organization discussion below.
It seems thatthere are 2 major
issues:
1. The ASF
Ted Leung wrote:
4. Some option that hasn't been thought of yet.
Based initially on the reorg discussions, and then a number of F2F
discussions at ApacheCon, I am planning on proposing something radical
within Jakarta, but it applies equally well here. I provided some
foreshadowing for
[suggestion to hold this discussion only on [EMAIL PROTECTED] from now?]
Sam Ruby wrote:
Separate code bases with separate communities should be separate
projects. Independent of the size of the codebase, if the size of
the community is only a few people, then it is not an ASF project.
Please note that axkit's core dev list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (note the extra el :-). I've had to forward all
mails so far, so if you could all change follow ups that would be great.
-
To unsubscribe,
