"Andrew C. Oliver" wrote:
>
> I've taken my first crack at this and its undergoing review before I
> post it. I dislike both actions and the flowmap. More
> specifically principally depending on Javascript.
Uh, thanks. I'm sure we'll be able to come up with a much better design
with such great
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Per-Olof Norén wrote:
>
>> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>>
> IMNSHO, the flowmap should totally replace actions and deprecate them.
Ahem, I thought we decided *not* to deprecate them, as they make
sense as elements
I've taken my first crack at this and its undergoing review before I
post it. I dislike both actions and the flowmap. More
specifically principally depending on Javascript.
-Andy
Christian Haul wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>
>> Per-Olof Norén wrote:
>>
>>> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>>>
>
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Per-Olof Norén wrote:
>
>> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>>
> IMNSHO, the flowmap should totally replace actions and deprecate them.
Ahem, I thought we decided *not* to deprecate them, as they make
sense as elements
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002, Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> >> IMNSHO, the flowmap should totally replace actions and deprecate them.
> >
> >
> > Ahem, I thought we decided *not* to deprecate them, as they make sense
> > as elements in the declarative sitemap.
> >
> > For web apps A
Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>
>>
>
> The spirit of this group has been that every contributor's opinion
> matters.
>
> One of the reasons I got hooked and am spending so much time on the
> list...
>
>
Don't mind me I'm just having a bad week. ;-)
--
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>
>>Reinhard,
>>
>>We are looking for someone to step up and show us how these two can work
>>together in a nice way.
>>
>>Interested?
>
>
> I am.
>
> IMNSHO, the flowmap should totally replace actions and deprecate them.
>
> I've looked at XMLF
Thanks for your thouts.
I would like to see an example at least as complex as the XMLForm demo
before I can comment.
The example needs to
1) Be able to handle most UI widgets, including checkboxes
2) Allow 2 way navigation
3) Make decisions about the next page based on:
a) validity of the i
Daniel Fagerström wrote:
[skip lots of great stuff]
> I strongly sugests that we should _not_ make general use of
> continuations available in the flowmap language as there is no need for
> it for what flowmaps are intended to do: describing multipage flow in
> webapps.
Daniel,
thanks for your
Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
>
> Reinhard,
>
> We are looking for someone to step up and show us how these two can work
> together in a nice way.
>
> Interested?
I am.
IMNSHO, the flowmap should totally replace actions and deprecate them.
I've looked at XMLForms and I must say it looks extremely unf
On 6/13/02 7:49 AM, "Daniel Fagerström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diana Shannon wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 06:31 PM, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Feel free to ask if you need further clarification about my integration
>>> proposal.
>>
>>
>> What *I'm* most interest
On 6/13/02 4:57 AM, "Diana Shannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 06:31 PM, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
>> Feel free to ask if you need further clarification about my integration
>> proposal.
>
> What *I'm* most interested in is a statement you made a while ago
Diana Shannon wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 06:31 PM, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
>
>> Feel free to ask if you need further clarification about my integration
>> proposal.
>
>
> What *I'm* most interested in is a statement you made a while ago on
> this list about the difficulties
On Wednesday, June 12, 2002, at 06:31 PM, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
> Feel free to ask if you need further clarification about my integration
> proposal.
What *I'm* most interested in is a statement you made a while ago on
this list about the difficulties students can have learning about
cont
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
>>We are looking for someone to step up and show us how these two can work
>>together in a nice way.
>>
>>Interested?
>>
>>
>>Ivelin
>
>
> Yes I am but my time and my java knowledge are limited (... but I'm
> learning)
So you have the itch. That's all it takes ;-]
>
> A
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> > We are looking for someone to step up and show us how these two can work
> > together in a nice way.
> >
> > Interested?
> >
> >
> > Ivelin
>
> Yes I am but my time and my java knowledge are limited (... but I'm
> learning)
>
> Anyway, I'll try it. Maybe there is somebody
> We are looking for someone to step up and show us how these two can work
> together in a nice way.
>
> Interested?
>
>
> Ivelin
Yes I am but my time and my java knowledge are limited (... but I'm
learning)
Anyway, I'll try it. Maybe there is somebody who has already some experience
(Daniel?) w
Reinhard,
We are looking for someone to step up and show us how these two can work
together in a nice way.
Interested?
Ivelin
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> Currently the "logic" of XMLForms is handled by the action. I read a few
> weeks ago that there are plans to use the flowmap for it.
> (http
Hi Reinhard,
On 6/11/02 6:46 AM, "Reinhard Poetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently the "logic" of XMLForms is handled by the action. I read a few
> weeks ago that there are plans to use the flowmap for it.
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=102071048209644&w=2)
>
> Is any
Currently the "logic" of XMLForms is handled by the action. I read a few
weeks ago that there are plans to use the flowmap for it.
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=102071048209644&w=2)
Is anybody working on an implemenation? What's the current status?
Regards,
Reinhard
---
20 matches
Mail list logo
