Re: map:parameter in map:components

2001-08-07 Thread giacomo
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Christian Haul wrote: > > > And a last one: I proposed some changes to esql.xsl on 04.jul. and > > > posted a patch on 11.jul. You asked me not to commit changes to > > > esql.xsl without review. So far no one had any comments. What course > > > of action would you suggest? >

Re: map:parameter in map:components

2001-07-23 Thread Christian Haul
On 20.Jul.2001 -- 11:43 PM, giacomo wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Christian Haul wrote: > > OK, what about ComposerAction then. Almost all subclasses have > > parameters specified in sitemap. Although few use the configure > > feature. I volunteer to extend them to use it. Afterall, a more > > con

Re: map:parameter in map:components

2001-07-20 Thread giacomo
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Christian Haul wrote: > On 20.Jul.2001 -- 07:35 AM, giacomo wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Christian Haul wrote: > > > No, no. I don't mean is is wrong to have configured Action instead of > > parameterized one in the pipeline. My insisting was > > > > 1. don't use a elemen

[Fwd: Re: map:parameter in map:components]

2001-07-20 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Forwarding to the list : I didn't noticed the reply-to header. BTW, changes are commited ! Sylvain Original Message Objet: Re: map:parameter in map:components Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:16:36 +0200 De: Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Société: Anyware Technologie

Re: map:parameter in map:components

2001-07-20 Thread Christian Haul
On 20.Jul.2001 -- 07:35 AM, giacomo wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Christian Haul wrote: > No, no. I don't mean is is wrong to have configured Action instead of > parameterized one in the pipeline. My insisting was > > 1. don't use a element for configuration Agreed. > 2. don't have a general

Re: map:parameter in map:components

2001-07-19 Thread giacomo
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Christian Haul wrote: > On 19.Jul.2001 -- 11:06 PM, giacomo wrote: > > I totally agree with you, Sylvain, and would encourage Christian to > > remove the hole configuration part from the AbstractAction at all > > because this forces new developer to think of using parameter >

Re: map:parameter in map:components

2001-07-19 Thread Christian Haul
On 19.Jul.2001 -- 11:06 PM, giacomo wrote: > I totally agree with you, Sylvain, and would encourage Christian to > remove the hole configuration part from the AbstractAction at all > because this forces new developer to think of using parameter > elements instead of better ones like bar. I found

Re: map:parameter in map:components

2001-07-19 Thread giacomo
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Hi team, > > I just discovered that many of the new actions/selector/matchers that > Christian added a week ago rely on value="pvalue"> for their configuration inside the , and > that a change on AbsctractAction also assumes this syntax for all > acti

Re: map:parameter in map:components

2001-07-19 Thread Christian Haul
On 19.Jul.2001 -- 01:30 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Christian, would you mind if I change the syntax ? It would be great to > have this fixed for beta 2. Sylvain, I'm sorry for that. I've not seen that discussion and assumed that it would be nice if parameters where the same for run-time and set

map:parameter in map:components

2001-07-19 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Hi team, I just discovered that many of the new actions/selector/matchers that Christian added a week ago rely on for their configuration inside the , and that a change on AbsctractAction also assumes this syntax for all actions. I'd like to remind the discussion that we had in May (see http://