David Crossley wrote:
We also do some specific validation of certain core configuration
using RELAX NG and the Jing task. This works fine for validating
the cocoon.roles file (note it has an internal DTD subset). We were
also doing some experimental validation of other files, such as
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
snip/
We also do some specific validation of certain core configuration
using RELAX NG and the Jing task. This works fine for validating
the cocoon.roles file (note it has an internal DTD subset). We were
also doing some experimental
David Crossley wrote:
Bugger. I was going to look into the Jing code because that would be the
ideal - make Jing use the xml-commons entity resolver. I see that there
is a newer Jing available - will investigate sometime.
Great ;)
Anyway, what do you think of the other issue - the idea of
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
snip/
Anyway, what do you think of the other issue - the idea of getting rid
of Cocoon's validate-xdocs target?
+1 if forrest does this for us it's ok
Okay, i will tidy that up in the next few days unless someone stops me.
- I think we
David Crossley wrote:
- I think we should remove all
the doc handling from cocoon. By this I mean the subsitemap we currently
have that generates the docs on the fly in the built webapp. I
hope to move this to forrest as well.
I agree. However, what do you mean by move this to forrest?
On 27 Jun 2003 at 11:22, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
- I think we should remove all
the doc handling from cocoon. By this I mean the subsitemap we
currently have that generates the docs on the fly in the built
webapp. I hope to move this to forrest as well.
I
