Hi,
I've come to this thread a few days late but I thought I would mention
how I did it as no body else here seems to have done it this way.
In tomcat the Cocoon servlet is mounted at the root, i.e. no prefix.
I started out using mod_jk and used JkMount for ech of the top level
sections of our w
On Thursday, Dec 5, 2002, at 12:05 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
I mean something like:
JkMount /!(images|movies|audio)*
no, this doesn't work. seems to be psedocode, hard to implement :-/
with the limited jk mount directives
Thanks for th
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> >>> I mean something like:
> >>>
> >>> JkMount /!(images|movies|audio)*
> >>
> >>
> >
> > no, this doesn't work. seems to be psedocode, hard to implement :-/
> > with the limited jk mount directives
>
> Thanks for the confirmation!
Yup, sorry, pseudocode
On Thursday, Dec 5, 2002, at 11:15 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote:
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 11:24 AM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote:
Effectively I guess you want rules that pass everything but images,
movies,
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 11:24 AM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote:
Effectively I guess you want rules that pass everything but images,
movies, audio, x-spaceprojects, harlem etc to mod_jk. Anyone else
know how
to
Hi Andrew,
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote:
Effectively I guess you want rules that pass everything but images,
movies, audio, x-spaceprojects, harlem etc to mod_jk. Anyone else know
how
to do that? ;-)
I mean something like:
JkMount /!(images|movies|audi
i'm currently in warp/jk/jk2 hades right now, so I can
tell you that you are correct that jk2 uses a totally
different syntax and mod_jk.so doesn't use it.
Here's what I'm picking up from the last two days of
not getting anything to connect:
- warp is now essentially (but not officially)
abandone
This is a different configuration syntax to the one I am using I think,
or are there two different syntaxes?
I am using mod_jk.so version 1.2.0, compiled locally.
I have an Apache .conf file, which loads the module, sets up
JkWorkersFile, JkMount etc. And a workers.properties file which sets u
> Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right?
>
> We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some
> served by Apache.
>
> It is not easy to separate them out because we need to retain legacy
> URLs. Likewise, it is not possible to give Cocoon served mate
Jeremy Quinn writes:
>
> On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:57 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 05:52 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 15:31 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:43 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Is 'JK2' the best one to be using now?
I am a bit confused between mod_webapp (warp) and JK[n] TBH.
I never got warp working, so I've always used Jk myself.
Sure you'll run into t
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 17:57 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote:
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 05:52 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 15:31 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote:
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi All
Can anyone advise m
No need to redirect, your problems can be solved with the AliasMatch
directive in httpd.conf:
AliasMatch ^(.*)/([^/]+\.gif)$ /path/to/images/$2
AliasMatch ^(.*)/([^/]+\.css)$ /path/to/css/$2
The above will match any .gif or .ccs, both legacy and cocoon, and serve
them from the same location.
HTH
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 05:52 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 15:31 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote:
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi All
Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right?
Many thanks for any h
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> Is 'JK2' the best one to be using now?
> I am a bit confused between mod_webapp (warp) and JK[n] TBH.
I never got warp working, so I've always used Jk myself.
> > Sure you'll run into troubles if there are html files in the static
> > directories, or yo
At 16:52 03/12/02, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Is 'JK2' the best one to be using now?
I am a bit confused between mod_webapp (warp) and JK[n] TBH.
If it is any consolation so am I.
I am using mod_webapp happily which I believe is the supposedly correct
thing to use, but since the JK one is older it
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 15:31 Europe/London, leo leonid wrote:
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi All
Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right?
Many thanks for any help
I had a very similar situation, I solved it by regarding th
On Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002, at 15:03 Europe/London, Andrew Savory wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some
served by Apache.
Is the stuff served by Apache static content, ie html, mpeg, avi, etc?
correct, but we cann
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:34 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
Hi All
Can anyone advise me on getting this complicated setup right?
We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some
served by Apache.
It is not easy to separate them out because we need to retain legacy
UR
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> We have a website that will have some stuff served by Cocoon and some
> served by Apache.
Is the stuff served by Apache static content, ie html, mpeg, avi, etc?
> It is not easy to separate them out because we need to retain legacy
> URLs. Likewise, it
20 matches
Mail list logo
