RE: R: Difference between cocoon: and file:// in map:part

2002-11-14 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Piotr, > Here I don't need to transform one xml to another one. I need html as > output. > > > 2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In this case you read your books and your menu directly (without using > > sub-pipelines) and you only

Re: R: Difference between cocoon: and file:// in map:part

2002-11-14 Thread Piotr Legiecki
Reinhard Poetz wrote: So the joined parts are not xml files anymore but html files? So I can't use on them anymore and I can't also use You have to possiblities: 1. Each of the map:part-pipelines returns the xml in the form you need it for your client. But make sure to use the XML seria

RE: R: Difference between cocoon: and file:// in map:part

2002-11-14 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Piotr, > -Original Message- > From: Piotr Legiecki [mailto:piotrlg@;sci.pam.szczecin.pl] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 2:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: R: Difference between cocoon: and file:// in map:part > > > Luca Morandini wrote: > &

Re: R: Difference between cocoon: and file:// in map:part

2002-11-14 Thread Piotr Legiecki
Luca Morandini wrote: Piotr, the "cocoon:" pseudo-protocol doesn't search for files, but for pipelines. With this pseudo-protocol you can build pipelines and call them (more or less as subroutines) from any aggregation. I see. So when I want to separate navigation and content (having menu.xm