On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 04:44 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Control is the last thing you want, that kills the spirit.
Recommendations,
There's also a tentative implementation of an authenticating and
authorizing wiki based on V2 of jspwiki. You can read more about it here:
Please check this page:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/PageInfo.jsp?page=XSPSyntax
Surely an IDIOT was destroying our work. This is not fair. I think we must
take some actions against this type of STUPID things!
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Does wiki not store revisions that can be rolled back?
/S
Antonio Gallardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check this page:
http://wiki.cocoondev.org/PageInfo.jsp?page=XSPSyntax
Surely an IDIOT was destroying our work. This is not fair. I think we must
take some actions against this type of
Steven Cummings wrote:
Does wiki not store revisions that can be rolled back?
/S
Still someone has to spot it before that is done. Meanwhile,
people can be confused and misled. But still, I love the
free spirit of the Wiki too much to see this as sufficient
reason to lock it down. What do you
That was one of my first thoughts. On the other hand, it wouldn't be that hard to
require logging in before editing as some people already do anyway. It's not like it
is even a big hassle, passwords aren't even required. It could be presented more like
Why don't you briefly introduce yourself
Steven Cummings dijo:
Of course it really can't be prevented, but
if a cookie is set and an IP
grabbed, then perhaps that person can be blocked in the future.
Hi:
First sorry to all the list for the subject of the mail. I was the one
that started this thread. I was very upset because I needed
On Thursday 29 May 2003 08:34 pm, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
When I started to use wiki. I loved that was freely editable, but after
that I think we must find a mechanism to control contribution. I mean this
kind of nonsense contributions that only destroy the builded work.
Control is the last
Hello Antonio,
don't take it so hard. The best means for making manipulation on the
Wiki useless is the possibility of fast restoring. This makes it a
harder work to manipulate than to restore - and this is no fun for the
manipulator and he won't do it so often.
Joerg
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
At 04:44 PM 5/30/2003, you wrote:
On Thursday 29 May 2003 08:34 pm, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
When I started to use wiki. I loved that was freely editable, but after
that I think we must find a mechanism to control contribution. I mean this
kind of nonsense contributions that only destroy the
