Re: newbie xsp question

2003-02-04 Thread Jim Bearce
I don't know why the simple.xsp was done the way it was but I believe you should also be able to write it this way: xsp:logic for (int i=0; i lt; 3; i++) { liItem xsp:expri/xsp:expr/li } /xsp:logic I think wrapping it in CDATA sections is just to make it possible to use the in the for

newbie xsp question

2003-02-03 Thread I-Lin Kuo
In the sample xsp provided with cocoon, on the page docs/samples/xsp/simple.xsp There's a section of code that looks like this: xsp:logic ![CDATA[ for (int i=0; i3; i++) {]]![CDATA[ ]] li Item xsp:expri/xsp:expr /li ![CDATA[ }

SV: Re: Newbie XSP question - why dosn't this work?

2001-11-12 Thread Søren Neigaard
, I know I am. I dont understand a thing at all Any input apriciated. Best regards Søren -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: David Rosenstrauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 6. november 2001 08:24 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Fwd: Re: Newbie XSP question - why dosn't this work? Søren

SV: Re: Newbie XSP question - why dosn't this work?

2001-11-09 Thread Søren Neigaard
: David Rosenstrauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 6. november 2001 08:24 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Fwd: Re: Newbie XSP question - why dosn't this work? Søren, OK. Problem solved. Frank was right. util:include-expr is the way to go. It will parse the text that you pass

Re: Newbie XSP question - why dosn't this work?

2001-11-03 Thread David Rosenstrauch
to something quite useless. I have attached my original post! Please help me :) -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 12. oktober 2001 04:41 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: SV: Newbie XSP question - why dosn't this work? Hi Søren

Newbie XSP question - why dosn't this work?

2001-11-02 Thread Søren Neigaard
! Please help me :) -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sendt: 12. oktober 2001 04:41 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: SV: Newbie XSP question - why dosn't this work? Hi Søren, On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Søren Neigaard wrote