On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 01:41:06PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:56:20PM +0100, u-x...@aetey.se wrote:
> > Kernel support for Coda under FreeBSD 11.x+ is now in quite a good shape
> > (thanks to the work of Edward Napierala at FreeBSD and to the support
> > from Chalmers Uni
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:56:20PM +0100, u-x...@aetey.se wrote:
> Kernel support for Coda under FreeBSD 11.x+ is now in quite a good shape
> (thanks to the work of Edward Napierala at FreeBSD and to the support
> from Chalmers University of Technology).
That is good news. I noticed the kernel sup
To whom it may concern,
Kernel support for Coda under FreeBSD 11.x+ is now in quite a good shape
(thanks to the work of Edward Napierala at FreeBSD and to the support
from Chalmers University of Technology).
What is lagging is a port package for the userland. Would anyone
on this list (CMU?) like
tage Coda source is very fond of
> > longs).
>
> I will check 32-bit.
I am confirming that the behaviour is the same as I reported earlier,
now tested on
FreeBSD xdat05 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:15:25 UTC 2012
r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 01:55:21PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> "coda_inactive: 0x usecount 1"
> yes, just informational as I was attempting to track something else
> down. I think usecount is expected to be 1 when coda_inactive is
> called, and I have updated what will be NetBSD 6 to no
At Coda accesses the console fills with kernel messages (in green)
"coda_inactive: 0x usecount 1"
seemingly once per Coda file being accessed for the first time
(per new cache entry?) I assume this to be just informational.
yes, just informational as I was attempting to track some
(made a mistake while posting, sorry if you get an extra copy because of this)
Hello Greg,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:53:47PM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> > (BTW there used to be some bad interaction between directory
> > formats in BSD vs Coda vs Linux which caused Linux-ABI programs
> > accessin
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 04:36:15PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> I'm also not sure I've tested the FreeBSD version of Coda on a 64-bit
> system. It might be worth doing a trial run on a 32-bit system to see if
> that helps -- if it does, we can do a bit of spelunking looking for bad
> behavio
u-codalist-s...@aetey.se writes:
> Hello Brett,
>
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:34:59AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
>> I know it is a different kettle of cats but coda seems to work fine on
>> 64bit NetBSD. Quite a while ago I did a bit of work trying to catch the
>> LP64 badness but one can never b
I'm also not sure I've tested the FreeBSD version of Coda on a 64-bit
system. It might be worth doing a trial run on a 32-bit system to see
if that helps --
No argument with your advice, but as of at least two years ago I was
running Coda ok on NetBSD/sparc64 (which is LP64). So the userla
Hello Brett,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 09:34:59AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
> I know it is a different kettle of cats but coda seems to work fine on
> 64bit NetBSD. Quite a while ago I did a bit of work trying to catch the
> LP64 badness but one can never be sure you found them all...
Wow. I have t
Hello Robert,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 04:36:15PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
> I've been tuned out of the Coda world for a while (and the FreeBSD world
> for most of the Autumn) due to other obligations. However, I'm not aware
> of FreeBSD kernel changes that should lead to the client not worki
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, u-codalist-s...@aetey.se wrote:
Anybody on the list running a Coda client on bleeding edge FreeBSD?
When I try the 6.9.4 from ports on 9-BETA2 it says "not tested" but goes
through the installation and does not crash the system (at least not
immediately :)
It does not u
Hello,
Anybody on the list running a Coda client on bleeding edge FreeBSD?
When I try the 6.9.4 from ports on 9-BETA2 it says "not tested"
but goes through the installation and does not crash the system
(at least not immediately :)
It does not unfortunately provide any useful file data, even tho
Hi, all!
I try install coda-6.0.7 from ports on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE.
I do:
vice-setup
...
venus-setup
...
After that I try create coda root volume, as vice-setup recommend.
createvol_rep codarootvl1 E100 /usr/home/codadm/vicepa
and get error:
Server E100 not in servers file
Hm... Strange.
I'm trying to see if there's anyone who can test some patches for the
vcoda device on FreeBSD 5-CURRENT and Phil Nelson said I should ask here.
In preperation for removing support for staticly configured device
counts in FreeBSD 6, I've prepared a patch that automaticly creates new
devices when th
16 matches
Mail list logo
