We had a discussion about this here yesterday. Phil, why don't you go for
the native Solaris C library and the native compiler. Take it step by
step: lwp, rpc2, rvm etc. and lets review what it looks like after each
step.
The key will be to really use the features of autoconf, like other
advanc
> My first impression trying myself was that the header layout on Solaris
> is sufficiently different that it might warrant using glibc under
> Solaris. Are there opinions on this?
I'd think that getting glibc to compile on Solaris is more of an adventure
than figuring out what header files ar
>We had a discussion about this here yesterday. Phil, why don't you go for
>the native Solaris C library and the native compiler. Take it step by
>step: lwp, rpc2, rvm etc. and lets review what it looks like after each
>step.
I don't think that using gcc and gnu make would be bad. It does look
Hi everybody,
I'm new to CODA, so please excuse me if I ask a FAQ.
In relation to the on going devlopment of linux PDA ports, I see CODA as a
perfect system for syncing a PDA with a desktop...
how much bigger would a linux kernel get, if a CODA module is added to it?
thanks, alex
Alexander Pe
