On 19 June 2013 17:37, Sylvain Thénault wrote:
>
> Hey guys, today is your last chance to contribute this to the pylint 10th
> anniversary sprint ;)
> And to get it in forthcoming 1.0...
>
> Monday and tuesday reports:
> https://www.logilab.org/blogentry/146924
> https://www.logilab.org/blogentry
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Sylvain Thénault
wrote:
> On 07 juin 09:18, Martin Pool wrote:
>> On 7 June 2013 06:49, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>
>> > If I never refer to self.x or self.y within the class's methods it
>> > would be nice to be alerted.
>> >
>>
>> +1, and that seems feasible to add
On 19 juin 06:59, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> I don't think I can make an actual patch, but can I suggest a very
> simple change? This message:
>
> Invalid name "f" for type variable (should match
> [a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
>
> would be simpler and clearer without the word "type". I always read
I don't think I can make an actual patch, but can I suggest a very
simple change? This message:
Invalid name "f" for type variable (should match
[a-z_][a-z0-9_]{2,30}$)
would be simpler and clearer without the word "type". I always read it
first as "f is not a valid name for a type".
On 07 juin 09:18, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 7 June 2013 06:49, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> > If I never refer to self.x or self.y within the class's methods it
> > would be nice to be alerted.
> >
>
> +1, and that seems feasible to add to pylint.
Hey guys, today is your last chance to contribute th
