Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR

I appreciate having delicious in the planet. Code4Lib's usage of this is one of the few reasons I'm still using delicious (which then posts for me to pinboard.in). I'd appreciate more organization of code4lib photos, if anybody wants to take stewardship of the flickr group we seem to have... -Jod

[CODE4LIB] attendees list? - and a plug for the 2011 conference wishlist

One suggestion for next year (add yours to the wishlist [1]) was to share peoples' names, email addresses, and affiliations. I was thinking that the ship had sailed for 2010--but given this email I wonder... Would it help to distribute a list of this year's attendees, even though the conference i

Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR

Reasonable arguments. The nice thing is that if delicious is removed, you can just subscribe to: http://feeds.delicious.com/v2/rss/tag/code4lib Ultimately this comes down to preference and jrochkind's stewardship. :) (Personally, I've always found the delicious stuff a distraction; I can al

Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR

I agree with Ranti. Delicious has become a way for us to share articles we find interesting to other people following the planet feed. I would hate for that medium to disappear. Rosalyn Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed -Original Message- From: Ranti Junu

Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR

Yep, I do not plan to remove delicious from the feed right now, we'll see how it goes. (I find it convenient to be able to send a link to the 'attention' of code4lib by delicious tagging it 'code4lib', and so far, I don't think this feature has led to too much usability trouble in the feed).

Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR

I'm a bit hesitant about removing delicious from the feed because I think this burst is a temporary only. I like the idea that anything code4lib will come in "one feed package" (that is, I don't have to go and check on separate places.) But one's mileage might vary. If the majority want it removed

Re: [CODE4LIB] Temporary redirection and the location bar

At Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:00:15 -0500, Esme Cowles wrote: > > One solution to this problem is to use a reverse proxy instead of a > redirect. We do this for our ARKs, so temporary URL is not shown to > the end user at all. > > This is not a general solution, especially for people who are > redirectin

Re: [CODE4LIB] C4L10 "Mobile Web App Design" slides

I was actually referring to the webOS emulator: http://developer.palm.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1744&Itemid=58 "Currently, the emulator does not support the following: * Accelerometer * Audio * Bluetooth (UI and any interface-specific APIs do not work in the em

Re: [CODE4LIB] C4L10 "Mobile Web App Design" slides

Hi Jason, > I have mostly worked in the iPhone Simulator, but in this case you will > miss out on testing some of the device's resource limitations. This does seem to be the more the case for the iPhone Simulator. And I think you are correct to point out that the difference between a simulator

[CODE4LIB] Job: Technology Director/Lead Software Engineer, Digital Antiquity

Technology Director/Lead Software Engineer, Digital Antiquity at Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287 Digital Antiquity, a national initiative funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, seeks a Technology Director/Lead Software Engineer to lea

Re: [CODE4LIB] C4L10 "Mobile Web App Design" slides

I have mostly worked in the iPhone Simulator, but in this case you will miss out on testing some of the device's resource limitations. I have had issues both with a native application and a mobile web app where I had smooth sailing in the simulator but then had crashes due to memory limitations on

Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR

+1 to all that as well Kevin On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Michael J. Giarlo wrote: > +1 to removing flickr > +1 to removing delicious as well > +1 to jrochkind using his discretion > > -Mike > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: >> Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr

[CODE4LIB] Last Call: Editors Wanted for the Code4Lib Journal

Hello, all. And sorry if you've seen this message three times now . . . this is the last posting, honest. The Code4Lib Journal is looking for volunteers to join its editorial committee. Editorial committee members work collaboratively to produce the quarterly Code4Lib Journal. Editors are expec

[CODE4LIB] The conf; my EmeraldView presentation

Hi all, thanks for a great conference! Special thanks to Naomi Dushay, Jessie Keck, and Bess Sadler and the rest of the Blacklight team for an awesome precon which gave me a good kick in the pants in terms of TDD, and more goodies. I notice that Solr has gone from preconference curiosity a fe

[CODE4LIB] A Guide to Distributed Digital Preservation

Apologies for cross-posting Announcement: publication of A Guide to Distributed Digital Preservation http://www.metaarchive.org/GDDP Authored by members of the MetaArchive Cooperative, A Guide to Distributed Digital Preservation is the first of a series of volumes from the Educopia Institute d

Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR

+1 to removing flickr +1 to removing delicious as well +1 to jrochkind using his discretion -Mike On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:36, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: > Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet. > > CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case (on > list or i

Re: [CODE4LIB] Planet code4lib - FLICKR

Yep, I agree, I'll remove flickr from the planet. CC'ing code4lib listserv in case anyone cares, you can make your case (on list or in private email to me), but at the moment as 'editor' of the planet I'm exersizing my editorial discretion to agree with Bernadette (I had the same opinion, but

[CODE4LIB] Google Book Search staff member?

Hi - I wonder - if the Google Book Search staff member who attended C4L10 is monitoring this list, could he contact me off-list? I didn't get a chance to continue the conversation that we almost started while waiting for dinner transportation Tuesday night, and I wonder what Google thinks of some

Re: [CODE4LIB] a first look at Code4Lib

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:42:45PM +, Mike Taylor wrote: > On 25 February 2010 12:07, Eric Lease Morgan wrote: > >> http://eric.clst.org/C4L/FirstLook > > > > Alas, I tried to post a comment to your First Look but I got an error upon > > submission. My comment is below: > > > >  I believe you