Re: [CODE4LIB] TemaTres 1.2, web tool to manage controlled vocabularies, has been released

2011-01-13 Thread diego ferreyra
Hi dear Eric, ... today we have released TemaTres keywords Distiller in google code. You can download it from: http://code.google.com/p/tematres-keywords-distiller/ TemaTres Keywords Distiller is a php tool to extract terms from a text and use it to obtain keywords from a specific controlled

[CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that... salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10, 20?/salesmans_voice Also, curious as to whether

[CODE4LIB] Yay, Code4Lib! Sponsorship goal accomplished!

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
Hi Code4Lib, You all are faster than I am. In the process of typing up that last email, someone contributed enough to put us at the 100% mark. Yay, Code4Lib! So, if we want to continue collecting (say set the goal at $1500), someone else pitch in and we'll keep the fun going... :-) Kevin

Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship

2011-01-13 Thread Francis Kayiwa
On 1/13/11 9:25 AM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed $960 towards the sponsorship of our 2011 conference! The goal was arbitrarily set at $1000, so we're only $40 short of that...salesmans_voiceAnyway want to pitch in those final dollars? 5, 10,

Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship

2011-01-13 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
I'm honestly not sure why we are fund-driving this from individuals, when the conference is, according to it's organizers, already sufficiently funded. So, no, I see no reason to up the goal. On 1/13/2011 10:25 AM, Kevin S. Clarke wrote: Great job Code4Lib! You've collectively contributed

Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
I think this is a good point to make (about the host saying they aren't lacking at this point)... for me (just one person speaking), this isn't about this year's conference being strapped for funds. Personally, I think this is in part a gauge to see whether this might work as a future method for

Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
Oh, and we've had three more people contribute since my emails, so I'll take that as a vote to push it up to $1500 (which I won't get to until later today). As with anything in Code4Lib, it's an optional involvement... no obligation to participate. Different people may also participate for their

Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship

2011-01-13 Thread LeVan,Ralph
+1 Just what I was going to say (except I didn't know about the rollover to next year option.) Thanks, Kevin! Ralph -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Kevin S. Clarke Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 11:30 AM To:

Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Presenters - a shared presentation machine? really????

2011-01-13 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
Might be worth finding some people from previous years; I think previous years managed recording of presentation projection (if not live screencast), despite presenters swapping out machines. They did it somehow. From: Code for Libraries

Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Presenters - a shared presentation machine? really????

2011-01-13 Thread Cary Gordon
I had a similar response. If the shared computer is exactly like mine, I might consider it. I have used a gadget called a TwinPact that sits between the 'puter and the projector and sucks out the video. It also has primitive, but useful, switching between sources and audio integration. Cary On

Re: [CODE4LIB] Code4Lib Community Sponsorship

2011-01-13 Thread Kevin S. Clarke
Good point, Jon. Indiana folks, if you have a desired deadline, let me know. Otherwise, I'll just wait until contributions trickle and then close it up. Update: we're up to $1215... woot! Kevin On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Jon Gorman jonathan.gor...@gmail.com wrote: I suspect we might