Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-04-02 Thread Dan Scott
Oh dear $deity: Given the impossibility of elevating one personal preference to universal satisfaction, would someone please step up and develop an extension to the mailing list preference settings so that each individual subscriber can set the reply-to behaviour to match their own desired

Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-04-02 Thread Ryan Eby
It's slow but you should be able to change your settings here, once you have a password: http://listserv.nd.edu/ It's actually been too slow once I get to a list for me to confirm. Eby On 4/2/07, Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh dear $deity: Given the impossibility of elevating one

Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-04-02 Thread Joe Hourcle
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Dan Scott wrote: Oh dear $deity: Given the impossibility of elevating one personal preference to universal satisfaction, would someone please step up and develop an extension to the mailing list preference settings so that each individual subscriber can set the reply-to

Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-03-31 Thread Edward Corrado
On Mar 30, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Daniel Chudnov wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Ross Singer wrote: Well that probably didn't need to go to the whole world, but there you go. /me votes for turning off reply-to munging on this list. -1 - replies should go to lists. :) i know, i know, its a

[CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-03-30 Thread Daniel Chudnov
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Ross Singer wrote: Well that probably didn't need to go to the whole world, but there you go. /me votes for turning off reply-to munging on this list.

Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-03-30 Thread Nathan Vack
/me votes to drop this list in Google Groups... -n On Mar 30, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote: turning_off_reply-to_munging_on_this_list-- -- Eric List Owner Morgan

Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-03-30 Thread Hilmar Lapp
It's not a charged issue, it's simply a harmful but entirely unnecessary practice. For a much more eloquent explanation, see for example http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Besides, not all email clients have a reply-to-sender feature (mine - Apple Mail - for example doesn't), but

Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-03-30 Thread Ed Summers
-0 There are strong religious arguments on both sides of this issue...and they are both equally boring. //Ed

Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-03-30 Thread Frumkin, Jeremy
@listserv.nd.edu CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu Sent: Fri Mar 30 12:36:44 2007 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services) -0 There are strong religious arguments on both sides of this issue...and they are both equally boring. //Ed

Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource Access Management Services)

2007-03-30 Thread Ross Singer
did this list turn into web4lib? *snarky off* -- jaf - Original Message - From: Code for Libraries CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu To: CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu Sent: Fri Mar 30 12:36:44 2007 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] not munging reply-to (was Re: [CODE4LIB] E-Resource