I second John Fereira's comment re: putting this information into a CMS
=) For instance it'd be awesome to browse by language...
And, Drupal actually has a series of library-related modules out there;
you already mention the MARC module in
http://infomotions.com/tmp/oss/discovery.html ...
On Jan 4, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Alejandro Garza Gonzalez wrote:
I second John Fereira's comment re: putting this information into a CMS =)
For instance it'd be awesome to browse by language...
For the past week or so I have been trying to evaluate content management
systems (CMS). Boy, there
Eric,
What's great about some of these systems is that there are modules written
to do exactly what you are talking about. For example there is a Drupal
module that will allow to export your Wordpress site and import it into
Drupal. Most of the PHP/MySQL CMSs I've played with have an underlying
On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Karen Coombs wrote:
What's great about some of these systems is that there are modules written
to do exactly what you are talking about... Hope this helps.
Yes, this makes sense. Thank you for elaborating. I think the next time we do
the website redesign thang we
On Dec 21, 2009, at 2:59 PM, John Fereira wrote:
Any thoughts on making this list something more dynamic, web 2.0ish?...
There certainly seems to be a demand for a more up-to-date list of
library-related open source software, and as alluded to previously, such a
thing has been attempted a
Putting it on a wiki anyone can edit makes it, perhaps, somewhat more
likely that it ends up maintained longer, making it easier for other
people to get involved in maintaining it without technological barriers
or proprietary feelings getting in the way.
Jonathan
Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
On
Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Putting it on a wiki anyone can edit makes it, perhaps, somewhat more
likely that it ends up maintained longer, making it easier for other
people to get involved in maintaining it without technological barriers
or proprietary feelings getting in the way.
I was
How about putting the data into freebase? http://www.freebase.com/
That would combine the write-access of a wiki with the structure of a
database.
I was getting ready to compile a very similar dataset myself, so I'd be
happy to do some of the requisite munging to get the data into freebase,
I would definitely nominate the Qubit Toolkit and the PKP software suite as
candidates for this list:
http://qubit-toolkit.org/
http://pkp.sfu.ca/
Qubit is somewhat nascent, but is actively being developed and is fairly
well-supported (by the ICA, UNESCO, LAC, among others), and the PKP suite
On Dec 21, 2009, at 12:55 PM, MJ Suhonos wrote:
I would definitely nominate the Qubit Toolkit and the PKP software suite as
candidates for this list:
http://qubit-toolkit.org/
http://pkp.sfu.ca/
Perfecto! Added locally. Thank you.
--
Eric Morgan
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Eric Lease Morgan
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 9:50 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] yaoss4ll
I am in the process of creating YAOSS4LL (Yet Another Open Source
Software
On Dec 21, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Westbrook, Bradley wrote:
Archivists' Toolkit (www.archiviststoolkit.org) is conspicuously absent
from your list of library OS CMS systems.
As you probably know, integration of AT and Archon is impending, a point
you might want to draw attention to in your
On Dec 21, 2009, at 12:49 PM, Eric Lease Morgan wrote:
http://infomotions.com/tmp/oss/
Thank you for the suggestions both on and off list. With your help I was able
to increase my list of viable OSS projects by just less than twenty items. The
'Net really works. If you have other
Any thoughts on making this list something more dynamic, web 2.0ish? I
think the list could be even more useful if one could do some sort of
faceted search on the information.
Looking at the not-viable list it seems that many of the entries were
considered not viable due to lack of
: Re: [CODE4LIB] yaoss4ll
Any thoughts on making this list something more dynamic, web 2.0ish? I
think the list could be even more useful if one could do some sort of faceted
search on the information.
Looking at the not-viable list it seems that many of the entries were
considered
Eric, the Kete project is another one you might want to add to your
list. It's intended to let libraries and archives create 'community
repositories' with user-generated content, and it was started by the
Horowhenua Library Trust, the same organisation that sponsored Koha.
The URL is:
Hi Eric,
I don't see CDS Invenio listed [1]. It's an institutional repository
system developed at CERN. It's an impressive piece of software, but
for one reason or another doesn't seem to get much attention. I intend
to give a lightning talk on it in Asheville in February.
--jay
[1]
17 matches
Mail list logo
