Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Shearer, Timothy
+1 This is a big deal. And one that has no great outcome. Y'all deserve the appreciation and thanks of the community. You certainly have mine. Tim >My thanks to the Tennessee folks for handling this with such grace.

Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Tom Johnson
> -Original Message- > > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of > > Collier, Aaron > > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 1:28 PM > > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga &g

Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Coral Sheldon-Hess
riginal Message- > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of > Collier, Aaron > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 1:28 PM > To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga > > I would guess that the swing between &q

Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Schurr, Andrea
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 1:28 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga I would guess that the swing between "current" and "if passed" makes securing the financial sponsor quite difficult. -Original Message- From

Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Brian Rogers
It is a confluence of considerations, rather than a question of percentage.

Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Collier, Aaron
4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga Just listening in, part of the discussion on Slack and IRC made it sound like the financing was the bigger issue. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt Connolly <mj...@cornell.edu> wrote: > > On Jun 7,

Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Matt Sherman
Just listening in, part of the discussion on Slack and IRC made it sound like the financing was the bigger issue. On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Matt Connolly wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Brian Rogers > > wrote: > >

Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Matt Connolly
On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:26 AM, Brian Rogers > wrote: We’ve determined that given this community’s commitment to providing a safe and accommodating environment for all attendees, it is morally and fiscally irresponsible to continue the effort of

Re: [CODE4LIB] Update Regarding C4L17 in Chattanooga

2016-06-07 Thread Salazar, Christina
It's probably too late for a 2017 but I really do think it's time to reopen the question of formalizing Code4Lib IF ONLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF BEING THE FIDUCIARY AGENT for the annual conference. Local (and national) politics aside, it's very difficult to stand in front of your boss (or worse, a