http://orcid.org/faq-page#n110
ORCID is an acronym, short for Open Researcher and Contributor ID.
pam
Pam Masamitsu
Reference and Systems
Phone: 925.424.4299
Email: masamit...@llnl.gov
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Main Library
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries
I think it's like OCLC in that it used to have a meaning, but now is just an
word
- A
___
Andrea Medina-Smith
Metadata Librarian
NIST Gaithersburg
andrea.medina-sm...@nist.gov
301-975-2592
Be Green! Think before you
http://orcid.org/faq-page#n110
Jason
Jason Stirnaman
Lead, Library Technology Services
University of Kansas Medical Center
jstirna...@kumc.edu
913-588-7319
On Jun 10, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Eric Lease Morgan emor...@nd.edu wrote:
Is ORCID an acronym, and if it is then what does it stand for? —ELM
On Jun 10, 2014, at 4:07 PM, Masamitsu, Pam masamit...@llnl.gov wrote:
http://orcid.org/faq-page#n110 - ORCID is an acronym, short for Open
Researcher and Contributor ID.
Resolved. Thanks! —ELM
On a related-new-things-at-Wikipedia note:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ORCID
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Masamitsu, Pam masamit...@llnl.gov wrote:
http://orcid.org/faq-page#n110
ORCID is an acronym, short for Open Researcher and Contributor ID.
pam
Pam Masamitsu
Reference
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORCID
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Eric Lease Morgan emor...@nd.edu wrote:
Is ORCID an acronym, and if it is then what does it stand for? —ELM
When Google comes to South Bend, Eric, you will look at information seeking
in a new light!
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Eric Lease Morgan emor...@nd.edu wrote:
Is ORCID an acronym, and if it is then what does it stand for? —ELM
I believe it stands for Open Researcher and Contributor ID:
http://orcid.org/node/47 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ORCID
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Eric
Lease Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:05 PM
To:
On a similar note, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pigsonthewing has
just (today / yesterday depending on timezone) been appointed Wikipedian
in residence at ORCID. He has tons of experience in museums, galleries
and archives and is a great person to get in touch with in this kind of
area.
On 6/4/14, 8:01 PM, Dave Caroline wrote:
You seem to have multiple so none are unique :)
Just in case this was the confusion, the U in URI stands for Uniform.
As Jodi says, there is no requirement for uniqueness of identifiers on
the web. In fact, non-uniqueness is a feature, not a bug. It
, in catalogerese)
while ORCiDs are only for individuals.
--DBL
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Eric
Lease Morgan
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 3:55 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] orcid and researcherid and scopus
Eric,
I do think that there is a difference between identification and the
uses that libraries have made of authorities. Part of it is historical
-- that libraries began using authority control before the use of
computers. Library authority control controls the form of the display of
the
Thx Eric for sharing with code4lib-rarians what we started discussing during
Italian lectures on semantic web and linked data [1] and in following emails.
My experience about VIAFid and ISNI began when Paola Manoni (BAV) suggested me
and my cataloguers at Pontificia Università della Santa Croce
Hi,
Of course there are more identifier systems (or domains, if you will).
Most/many authors in The Netherlands have a Digital Author Identifier
(DAI), which is the record number in the GGC (Gemeenschappelijk
Geautomatiseerd Catalogiseersysteem), or Shared Automated Catalogue
system.
The DAIs
I learned about ORCID at the VIVO conference last August, and followed
up by attending the ORCID Community Outreach meeting two weeks ago. At
UCLA, we see ORCID as a key service to name disambiguation.
The ORCID organization works effectively with all the constituents by
defining roles
If there is really an appetite to continue DAIs going forward, the
wikipedia support for identifiers is modula and there's no reason not to
add more identifiers.
cheers
stuart
On 06/05/2014 11:06 PM, Ben Companjen wrote:
Hi,
Of course there are more identifier systems (or domains, if you
On 06/06/2014 12:51 AM, Gary Thompson wrote:
I also hope to convince our campus Shibboleth IdP to add ORCID as a new
attribute.
If I understand correctly, what we need is ISNI added to the next
release of EduPerson, per
We are including these identifiers in the authority records we create for our
system.
Here is an example record in the UNT Name App for me with some of these links.
http://digital2.library.unt.edu/name/nm001/
Here is a record with VIAF and LC identifiers integrated.
* ORCID - http://orcid.org/-0002-9952-7800
* ResearcherID - http://www.researcherid.com/rid/F-2062-2014
* Scopus - http://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.url?authorId=25944695600
* VIAF - http://viaf.org/viaf/26290254
* LC - http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n94036700
* ISNI -
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Dave Caroline dave.thearchiv...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 04/06/2014, Eric Lease Morgan emor...@nd.edu wrote:
ORDID and ResearcherID and Scopus, oh my!
It is just me, or are there an increasing number of unique identifiers
popping up in Library Land? A person
On Jun 4, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Jodi Schneider jschnei...@pobox.com wrote:
However, I believe that ISNI is bridging between these various sources --
certainly including LC and VIAF [1], and also ORCID [2].
[1] http://www.isni.org/content/data-contributors
[2] From
Don’t forget pseudo-identifiers (can we consider them real identifiers?) like
Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic Search…
Peter
On Jun 4, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Eric Lease Morgan emor...@nd.edu wrote:
ORDID and ResearcherID and Scopus, oh my!
It is just me, or are there an increasing number
to an individual by an external agency,
often for rights-tracking purposes, as in the case of recorded
performances.
--DBL
From: David Lowe
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 4:20 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: RE: [CODE4LIB] orcid and researcherid and scopus, oh my
Been tracking the ORCiD/ISNI
Others have made excellent contributions to this thread, which I won't
repeat, but I feel it's worth asking the question:
Who is systematically cross walking these identifiers?
The only party I'm aware of doing this in a large-scale fashion is
Wikipedia, via
24 matches
Mail list logo
