Hey Ravi,
I actually learned about TinkerPop from a posting on this list from
Brian Tingle and I started playing with it and eventually started
working with it for the digital repository we're building. I actually
began with the Sail extension, but scaled back to non-RDF model on
that after
Maybe a G search can help to find comparisons:
http://www.google.com/search?sugexp=chrome,mod=4sourceid=chromeie=UTF-8q=4store+Virtuoso+Jena+SDB++Mulgara
The result includes your post... added 8 minutes ago.
Stefano
On 29/mag/2012, at 09.12, Ravi Shankar wrote:
We (DLSS at Stanford Libraries)
Hi Ravi,
Yeah, if you haven't seen it yet, take a look at the first link
(http://www.w3.org/wiki/LargeTripleStores) in the search results that
Stefano included.
A big question is if you're going to need reasoning capabilities. If
that's the case, you'll probably want to look at the first 3 in
Thanks, Stefano. The Europeana report seems to be quite comprehensive. It is
funny that I've searched earlier for triple store comparisons with more
explicit parameters 'rdf triple store comparison', and the Europeana report
appeared in the third page of the search results. The 'triple' in the
For those using these big triplestores, how are you putting data in? I'm
looking for a triplestore which supports SPARQL update. Any comments
anyone can add on this interface will be useful.
Ethan
On May 29, 2012 4:12 PM, Ravi Shankar rshan...@stanford.edu wrote:
Thanks, Stefano. The
Hi Chris,
We were currently leaning towards open-source triple stores. As far as
inferencing goes, I suspect we will be doing at least transitive closures on
rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:subPropertyOf properties. I will look into TinkerPop.
Are you currently using it, and for what purpose? I am
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Ravi Shankar rshan...@stanford.edu wrote:
We were currently leaning towards open-source triple stores. As far as
inferencing goes, I suspect we will be doing at least transitive closures
on rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:subPropertyOf properties. I will look into
Hi Ravi - I'll let some of my more technical folks chime in, but we do a bunch
with RDF and have found every triplestore we've tried very limited in handling
transactions. Reading and writing at the same time causes a deadlock that's a
mess to keep clean. So, we went back where we started and
The latest version of Jena TDB adds atomic transactions (version 0.9.0+)
See http://jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/tdb_transactions.html for
documentation:
The following limitations are listed:
- Bulk loads: the TDB bulk loader is not transactional
- Nested transactions are not
