REMINDER -- ABSTRACTS DUE BY 1 NOVEMBER 2010
Call For Papers: "Electronic Records to Born-Digital Archives:
Evolution in Theory and Practice"
Archivaria #72, Fall 2011
Archivists have dealt with digitally-created records for over 35
years. During this time, the archival profession has made signif
OK - thanks both will pursue this - taking on board Jonathan's points on the
issues around this
Owen
Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936
On 21 Oct 2010, at 22:07, Walker, David wrote:
>> Yes - my reading was th
> Yes - my reading was that dlf:holdings was for pure 'holdings'
> as opposed to 'availability'.
I would agree with Jonathan that putting a summary of item availability in
is not an abuse.
For example, ISO Holdings -- one of the schemas the DLF-ILS documents suggests
using here -- has element
Thanks Dave,
Yes - my reading was that dlf:holdings was for pure 'holdings' as opposed to
'availability'. We could put the simpleavailability in there I guess but as
you say since we are controlling both ends then there doesn't seem any point
in abusing it like that. The downside is we'd hoped to
I don't think that's an abuse. I consider to be for
information about a "holdingset", or some collection of "items", while
is for information about an individual item.
I think regardless of what you do you are being over-optimistic in
thinking that if you just "do dlf", your stuff will inte
Sorry Jonathan - meant to say thanks - and that your blog posts were already
my 'required reading' for doing anything with ils-di stuff!
Owen
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> I believe you are correct. The ils-di stuff is just kind of a framework
> starting point, no
Hey Owen,
Seems like the you could use the element to hold this kind of
individual library information.
The DLF-ILS documentation doesn't seem to think that you would use
dlf:simpleavailability here, though, but rather MARC or ISO holdings schemas.
But if you're controlling both ends of the c
I just got back into town, but let me know if there's anything I can
help with or work on.
-karen
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:10:24 -0400, Dot Porter wrote:
Thanks for the annotations Jodi - this is my first Code4Lib so I'm
kind of playing it by ear ;-)
I think Nov. 19th as a deadline for preconf
windows
-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:code4...@listserv.nd.edu] On Behalf Of
Ethan Gruber
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 2:37 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] converting video DVDs to something that will
play on the web
Hi Ginny,
What opera
