Re: [CODE4LIB] EZProxy changes / alternatives ?

2014-02-05 Thread Don Hamparian
Hello Riley, and everyone participating. Your email is a very succinct
summary of what many are likely thinking right now about EZproxy, its
future, and open source or other alternatives.

 As a nonprofit membership organization, OCLC strives to align its
pricingwith our mission to serve our members. Our
goal is to continue to deliver value through the EZproxy service at a price
that makes it accessible to as many libraries as possible, while continuing
to develop the service and provide support to its users. There are no plans
to substantially change the pricing model of the stand-alone EZproxy
service.

Regarding innovation, IPV6 development starts next month with an IPV6
release planned later this year. We also have some final testing on
EZproxy's GZIP compression functionality, as well as statistical reporting
features in the pipeline. And of course, we continue to make our
maintenance fixes and improvements. We will release as many features as we can
and continue to deliver increased value at a reasonable price.

We recognize and respect the importance of the open source ethic and the
breadth of open source activity in the library community and believe
libraries always benefit from having choices in the services they use. That
said, the EZproxy application provides great value to its users that would
not easily be replicated. In addition to the internal mechanics of
providing proxied access to remote users, it includes nearly 15 years of
ensuring access to hundreds of e-content targets--including a very long
tail--using many authentication models, both in libraries and with content
providers. With that in mind, we believe the current model is quite
reasonable compared to rebuilding that kind of effort from scratch.

We look forward to enhancing the stand-alone EZproxy service under its new
business model as well as enhancing the service offered with the turn-key
hosted model. Your input and suggestions are welcome, as always.  We look
forward to working together to continue to reduce barriers of access to
e-content in our community.

Don

Don Hamparian
Sr. Product Manager
Identity Management and EZproxy
OCLC

614.764.6017 (w)
614.975.5750 (m)


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Riley Childs rchi...@cucawarriors.comwrote:

 I never thought about this before, but it makes perfect sense, it is
 impossible for the only product in the industry to maintain a perpetual
 licensing model, EZProxy is the only one stop shop of its kind, and that is
 exactly the reason an alternative is needed. Not because EZProxy is lacking
 or expensive (it is a great product for the price) but as many others have
 said: it is the only one, service vendors require EZProxy, we need to
 change that purely for the sake of improvement, if the OCLC has incentive
 to improve it will, but right now it has the market cornered, leaving no
 need for inovation.

 This was basically what everyone has said (I think!) and there are valid
 points for staying with EZProxy or switching, but the one that is most
 pressing: monopoly, EZProxy is a unique animal, and who knows? $500/year
 today $1000/year tomorrow, maybe even client access licenses? That is the
 real reason an alternative is needed now.

 I hope this makes sense
 //Riley

 Sent from my iPhone

  On Feb 3, 2014, at 4:21 PM, Peter Murray peter.mur...@lyrasis.org
 wrote:
 
  I think it also useful to think about this from the service provider's
 perspective.  There have been a few calls for enhancements/fixes in this
 thread, but with no source of ongoing revenue (for self-hosted
 installations, at least) I don't know how we can realistically expect the
 service provider to devote resources to those enhancements/fixes.  The $500
 paid for the perpetual right to run the software is good if you never
 expect the software to change, particularly for something that has the
 market saturation that EZproxy does (since there is a decreasing number of
 new subscribers to pay the bills for added development).  The same could be
 said for paying the way of the technical writers to write documentation for
 the new features added to the system.
 
 
  Peter
  --
  Peter Murray
  Assistant Director, Technology Services Development
  LYRASIS
  peter.mur...@lyrasis.org
  +1 678-235-2955
  800.999.8558 x2955



Re: [CODE4LIB] OCLC Service Outage Update

2010-05-11 Thread Don Hamparian
Jonathan, I'll check this out this morning.

Don Hamparian
OCLC



On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:

 I _believe_ that the OCLC FirstSearch shibboleth server is still down, for
 anyone who tries to send their users to FirstSearch via Shibboleth.


 Simon Spero wrote:

 At least it wasn't  a totally transparent  UPS test scheduled for the
 Thursday of Thanksgiving weekend.  My personal philosophy is that every
 rack
 should have its own UPS separate from the data center one, with enough
 capacity to keep going through blips,and handle a clean shutdown if
 necessary.  That way,  when the ops team messes up, far fewer sysadmins
 get
 their weekend ruined.

 Of course, the real problem is that too many people are writing
 unoptimized
 code in energy-inefficient languages like ruby and PHP, which require far
 more servers, and far more cooling, to do the same work as properly
 written
 code.  If carbon emissions should turn out to be a  strong forcer  of
 global
 warming, then we can clearly say that every time you write  PHP, Phil
 Jones
 kills a polar bear. Please, think of the polar bears.

 Simon






Re: [CODE4LIB] OCLC Service Outage Update

2010-05-11 Thread Don Hamparian
Jonathan and others who use Shibboleth access to First Search - access
looks up and normal so if anyone has any problems - email us at
shibbol...@oclc.org.

Don


On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Don Hamparian don.hampar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Jonathan, I'll check this out this morning.
 Don Hamparian
 OCLC


 On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote:

 I _believe_ that the OCLC FirstSearch shibboleth server is still down, for
 anyone who tries to send their users to FirstSearch via Shibboleth.

 Simon Spero wrote:

 At least it wasn't  a totally transparent  UPS test scheduled for the
 Thursday of Thanksgiving weekend.  My personal philosophy is that every
 rack
 should have its own UPS separate from the data center one, with enough
 capacity to keep going through blips,and handle a clean shutdown if
 necessary.  That way,  when the ops team messes up, far fewer sysadmins
 get
 their weekend ruined.

 Of course, the real problem is that too many people are writing
 unoptimized
 code in energy-inefficient languages like ruby and PHP, which require far
 more servers, and far more cooling, to do the same work as properly
 written
 code.  If carbon emissions should turn out to be a  strong forcer  of
 global
 warming, then we can clearly say that every time you write  PHP, Phil
 Jones
 kills a polar bear. Please, think of the polar bears.

 Simon






[CODE4LIB] Job Posting: Developer Network Product Manager

2009-11-20 Thread Don Hamparian
 Network:

o   2-4 years developing library or cultural heritage institution-related
web application

o   Knowledge and experience  of web 2.0 principles including web service
development and mashups

o   Involvement / leadership in the library technical (software development)
community

To apply for this opening, please go to:
http://www.oclc.org/us/en/careers/default.htm  Click on Job ID # 1801


-- 
Don Hamparian
Manager OCLC Grid Portfolio
OCLC
mailto:hampa...@oclc.org
614.764.6017 (voice)
614.975.5750 (mobile)
IM, IP Phone (Skype) donhamp2
ICQ: 412-913-446
http://worldcat.org/devnet