Re: [CODE4LIB] linked data endpoints

2011-05-17 Thread Ian Mulvany
Setting aside the issue of disambiguation, dbpedia provides a linked data 
interface to the content of wikipedia. 

Connecting that to your XML is just a question of the document model you use. 

If you want to know whether endpoint a is the same as endpoint b in the linked 
data world you can try the sameas service. 



On 16 May 2011, at 15:37, Jon Gorman jonathan.gor...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just to clarify, are you picturing some sort of feedback loop?  I'm
 just trying to get a better picture of the process (sounds like an
 interesting project).
 
 In other words, do you have something like:
 
 1) take in a full-text document (like, say, a novel?)
 2) Run it through NER, pull out locations, places, things.
 3) Have a user who's read the novel (or perhaps display those words in
 context?) go through each the locations and pick a lat  long using
 Google Maps as an interface.  (Ie says this Dublin is Dublin, OH not
 Dublin, Ireland).
 4) Do something similar with names, only using some sort of resource
 like dbpedia to display possible individuals?
 5) markup the original file in an XML doc w/ identifiers around those
 occurrences?
 
 Is that what you're picturing?
 
 Jon G.
 
 Who doesn't really know enough about linked data to contribute, but is
 interested nonetheless.


[CODE4LIB] our Mendeley API contest is now live

2011-03-08 Thread Ian Mulvany
Hi Everyone.

As I mentioned at my CODE4LIB presentation, we are launching a $10,001
API contest for apps built with the Mendeley API.

This has not been announced.

You can get more info here:

http://dev.mendeley.com/

If anyone has any specific questions let me know!

- Ian

-- 
Ian Mulvany | VP New Product Development
http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/ian-mulvany/

Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com
Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015


[CODE4LIB] WIND and CAS

2011-02-23 Thread Ian Mulvany
Columbia has this very specific framework for developing applications,
it's called WIND
http://www.columbia.edu/acis/rad/authmethods/wind/index.html#d0e37

Is this just a name for another form of login system, or is it really
a totally independent piece of architecture?

- Ian

-- 
Ian Mulvany | VP New Product Development
http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/ian-mulvany/

Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com
Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015


Re: [CODE4LIB] Ranking factors for library resources: Who really uses what?

2011-02-16 Thread Ian Mulvany
In Mendeley we are using number of readers to rank search results on
our catalog.

Our search index is in solr.

I don't have more fine grained details, but I could get them if people
are interested.

- Ian

On 16 February 2011 14:21, LeVan,Ralph le...@oclc.org wrote:
 As you pointed out, WorldCat does all sorts of tricky ranking.  I
 believe there's a dashboard that they use for tuning the ranking.
 Library holdings count, term frequencies, availability, FRBR, and
 locality are all facets of that ranking.

 In OCLC Research we do practically nothing without some sort of ranking.
 In our VIAF project, we gather name authority records from 20-some
 national libraries and merge matching records into a single VIAF record.
 We rank search results by the size of the records, figuring that the
 larger a record is, the more attention the component records got from
 the national libraries and that size can be used as an indirect measure
 of popularity.

 In WorldCat Identities, we create author records from WorldCat data.
 Simple SRU searches are ranked by the total number of items held in
 libraries for that author.  There is also a fuzzy name searching service
 for WorldCat Identities that uses a combination of holdings and
 similarity to rank results.

 We use WorldCat holdings information for ranking wherever we can.  For
 instance, our FAST subject headings database returns results ranked by
 holdings.

 We've never done any usability testing on these ranking algorithms as
 they are simply clearly superior to no ranking at all.

 Ralph

 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf
 Of
 Till Kinstler

 ...

 So, if you implemented something beyond term statistics based ranking,
 speak up and show.




-- 
Ian Mulvany | VP New Product Development
http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/ian-mulvany/

Mendeley Limited | London, UK | www.mendeley.com
Registered in England and Wales | Company Number 6419015