Re: [CODE4LIB] Ontology Question

2011-11-11 Thread Alexander Johannesen
Hiya, Is it okay to just use the classes I need or should I include the super classes which they belong to? I think we also need to define a few concepts here. What do you mean, include? As far as I can tell, you want to say something like Here's a few concepts we're using, and their

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ontology Question

2011-11-11 Thread Lepczyk, Timothy
] On Behalf Of Alexander Johannesen Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 4:08 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Ontology Question Hiya, Is it okay to just use the classes I need or should I include the super classes which they belong to? I think we also need to define a few

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ontology Question

2011-11-11 Thread Ethan Gruber
and CRM Entity? Best, Tim -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Alexander Johannesen Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 4:08 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Ontology Question Hiya, Is it okay to just use

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ontology Question

2011-11-10 Thread Karen Coyle
Quoting Lepczyk, Timothy tlepc...@wustl.edu: Hi All, I'm putting together an ontology for a collection either using CIDOC-CRM, or a mix of CIDOC-CRM and FOAF. I don't need the whole CIDOC-CRM ontology. Is it okay to just use the classes I need or should I include the super classes

Re: [CODE4LIB] Ontology Question

2011-11-10 Thread Lepczyk, Timothy
Thanks, Karen, that's the direction I was going to go, but just wasn't sure. Best, Tim -Original Message- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Karen Coyle Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 2:03 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB