Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-21 Thread Owen Stephens
The stuff by Mitchell Whitelaw on Generous Interfaces (and he cites some 
aspects of Trove as an example of a generous interface) seems relevant to this 
discussion:

Slides: http://www.slideshare.net/mtchl/generous-interfaces
Paper: 
http://www.ica2012.com/files/data/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00423.pd
f

Owen

Owen Stephens
Owen Stephens Consulting
Web: http://www.ostephens.com
Email: o...@ostephens.com
Telephone: 0121 288 6936


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Michael Gonzalez
I like what NCSU has done:

http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/



-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of 
Alexander Johannesen
Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2012 8:11 AM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

I love the Trove from the National Library of Australia ;

   http://trove.nla.gov.au/


Alex
-- 
 Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
--- http://shelter.nu/blog/ --
-- http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Predmore, Andrew
Šand the third answer promotes Drupal.

There are further votes for Drupal and NCSU.

Clayton Andrew Predmore
Manager, Web Operations
Yale University Library
andrew.predm...@yale.edu






On 9/19/12 4:18 PM, Sian Meikle sian.mei...@utoronto.ca wrote:

Full disclosure -- it IS our library's site -- but the University of
Toronto Libraries use a drupal frontend to integrate our library
catalogue (Endeca), Summon (local presentation powered by Summon APIs),
e-journals (a filtered subset of catalogue data via Endeca), and resource
guides (LibGuides).

These services, in turn, integrate other data: for example:
--  permitted uses (eg licensed rights) data is integrated directly in
the catalogue and Summon interfaces for digital titles;
-- the catalogue also uses StackMap to display shelf locations for some
libraries.
-- the catalogue offers a locally-developed shelf browse that integrates
print collections system wide with digital collections

Start here:
http://www.library.utoronto.ca

We, in turn, are long-time admirers of the NCSU libraries and their
discovery interface work (http://library.ncsu.edu/)

Sian Meikle
--
Sian Meikle 416.946.3689 (work)416.978.1668 (fax)
130 St. George St, 7th floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A5
Interim Director, ITS, University of Toronto Libraries

From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Tania
Fersenheim [tan...@brandeis.edu]
Sent: September-19-12 3:00 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
e.g.:

 - library catalog
 - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
 - ejournals
 - ebooks
 - libguides
 - library web site
 - worldcat local
 - that kind o' stuff

I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

Tania

--

Tania Fersenheim
Manager of Library Systems

Brandeis University
Library and Technology Services

415 South Street, (MS 017/P.O. Box 549110)
Waltham, MA 02454-9110
Phone: 781.736.4698
Fax: 781.736.4577
email: tan...@brandeis.edu


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Jimmy Ghaphery
Here's touting our own site:
http://www.library.vcu.edu/
http://search.library.vcu.edu

This search is using a hosted instance of Ex Libris' Primo. So I'm not sure
we qualify as technologically sophisticated in terms of coding our own
discovery layer. I do think we are exemplary for simplicity of the search
layer, using the combined everything (catalog + journal articles + local
digital collections) as the default. These scoped searches are only
available through advanced search. We have broken out of the tab-crazy
UI. What is especially interesting I think about our case is that shortly
this Fall our OPAC will completely disappear, as we are one of the early
adopters of Alma which uses Primo as its front end.

We have been running the following aggressive stop sign for links into the
catalog since summer without great uproar:
http://www.library.vcu.edu/catalog/

So, we are all in for a single search solution. I had many reservations
about this direction at first with great attachment to developing and
featuring a separate search for the traditional catalog dressed up in
discovery. Some of my colleagues did a good job challenging these
assumptions and pushing us forward.

--Jimmy

-- 
Jimmy Ghaphery
Head, Library Information Systems
VCU Libraries
804-827-3551

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Tania Fersenheim tan...@brandeis.eduwrote:

 Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

 I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
 successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
 e.g.:

  - library catalog
  - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
 Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
  - ejournals
  - ebooks
  - libguides
  - library web site
  - worldcat local
  - that kind o' stuff

 I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
 use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
 technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

 Tania

 --

 Tania Fersenheim
 Manager of Library Systems

 Brandeis University
 Library and Technology Services

 415 South Street, (MS 017/P.O. Box 549110)
 Waltham, MA 02454-9110
 Phone: 781.736.4698
 Fax: 781.736.4577
 email: tan...@brandeis.edu



Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Hamilton, Gill
My current fav is Digital NZ
http://www.digitalnz.org/

Gill
--
Gill Hamilton
Digital Access Manager
National Library of Scotland
Edinburgh, Scotland
g.hamil...@nls.uk


-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Tania Fersenheim
Sent: 19 September 2012 20:00
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
e.g.:

 - library catalog
 - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
 - ejournals
 - ebooks
 - libguides
 - library web site
 - worldcat local
 - that kind o' stuff

I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

Tania

-- 

Tania Fersenheim
Manager of Library Systems

Brandeis University
Library and Technology Services

415 South Street, (MS 017/P.O. Box 549110) Waltham, MA 02454-9110
Phone: 781.736.4698
Fax: 781.736.4577
email: tan...@brandeis.edu
***
Visit the National Library of Scotland online at www.nls.uk
***
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify the Information Systems Helpdesk 
on +44 131 623 3789 or is.helpd...@nls.uk and delete this e-mail. The 
statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and 
do not necessarily reflect those of the National Library of Scotland. The 
National Library of Scotland is a registered Scottish charity. Scottish Charity 
No. SC011086. This message is subject to the Data Protection Act 1998 
and Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 and has been 
scanned by iCritical.
*** 

Follow us on Twitter for twice-weekly updates.
Become our fan on Facebook and keep up-to-date that way too.


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread BWS Johnson
Salvete!


 My current fav is Digital NZ
 http://www.digitalnz.org/
 

    Can't. Resist. Plug. Batman.

    Y'all are nerds, so undoubtedly, y'all prolly know this stuff already, 
bttt
    
    That started in part with Kete.

http://kete.net.nz/site/topics/show/329-kete-open-source-software-for-community-digital-libraries

 Te Horowhenua Trust, 

http://library.org.nz

 then The Horowhenua Library Trust basically bit the bullet for everyone a 
second time (Koha was the first) in making that bit of Open Source Software 
happen. If your current favourite is a strong enough thing to get ye to dig 
into the moth eaten oft empty folding jobbie you keep in your pants or purse, 
they could REALLY bloody use it. They've a new building to pay for (among a 
zillion other things) so if you're really that keen on cool stuff happening, 
show em some 3. Big olde blinky button on the upper right labeled Donate Now.

http://www.tetakere.org.nz/ 

Royt made me plug this against my free will,
Brooke


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Karen Coyle
Every one of this suggestions has one major flaw, IMO. The primary 
result of a search is a big set of bibliographic records -- more than 
the user can possible look through. In some of them there are facets 
available, but in no case is there any useful analysis of set in a 
visualization that would allow the user to get a picture of what she has 
retrieved. I'm thinking timelines, a la' WorldCat Identities or the Open 
Library subject pages [1]. Also, none of them tell the user more about 
the person or subject or work that they have retrieved. (At least, in 
the views that I have seen.) I really think that lists of manifestations 
just aren't good enough when searches bring up hundreds of results.


kc
[1] some examples:
http://openlibrary.org/subjects/halley%27s_comet
http://openlibrary.org/subjects/place:istanbul_%28turkey%29
and see others at: http://openlibrary.org/subjects
or look for your favorites


On 9/20/12 6:03 AM, Hamilton, Gill wrote:

My current fav is Digital NZ
http://www.digitalnz.org/

Gill
--
Gill Hamilton
Digital Access Manager
National Library of Scotland
Edinburgh, Scotland
g.hamil...@nls.uk


-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Tania Fersenheim
Sent: 19 September 2012 20:00
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
e.g.:

  - library catalog
  - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
  - ejournals
  - ebooks
  - libguides
  - library web site
  - worldcat local
  - that kind o' stuff

I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

Tania



--
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Sean Hannan
Every one of these sites is not going to work for everyone.

Please conduct your own user research for your own audience.

Our users, for example, have no interest in visualizations of search
results.

Our researchers actually want just a list of results. They are compiling
bibliographies or reading lists and they honestly just want a really long
page of titles and authors of what we have.

-Sean

On 9/20/12 11:03 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:

 Every one of this suggestions has one major flaw, IMO. The primary
 result of a search is a big set of bibliographic records -- more than
 the user can possible look through. In some of them there are facets
 available, but in no case is there any useful analysis of set in a
 visualization that would allow the user to get a picture of what she has
 retrieved. I'm thinking timelines, a la' WorldCat Identities or the Open
 Library subject pages [1]. Also, none of them tell the user more about
 the person or subject or work that they have retrieved. (At least, in
 the views that I have seen.) I really think that lists of manifestations
 just aren't good enough when searches bring up hundreds of results.
 
 kc
 [1] some examples:
 http://openlibrary.org/subjects/halley%27s_comet
 http://openlibrary.org/subjects/place:istanbul_%28turkey%29
 and see others at: http://openlibrary.org/subjects
 or look for your favorites
 
 
 On 9/20/12 6:03 AM, Hamilton, Gill wrote:
 My current fav is Digital NZ
 http://www.digitalnz.org/
 
 Gill
 --
 Gill Hamilton
 Digital Access Manager
 National Library of Scotland
 Edinburgh, Scotland
 g.hamil...@nls.uk
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
 Tania Fersenheim
 Sent: 19 September 2012 20:00
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers
 
 Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL
 
 I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
 successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
 e.g.:
 
   - library catalog
   - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
 Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
   - ejournals
   - ebooks
   - libguides
   - library web site
   - worldcat local
   - that kind o' stuff
 
 I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
 use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
 technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?
 
 Tania
 


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Jing Xiao

Totally agreed.

Just reading through those email and feel we might off the topic.

If we want to go from location A to location B. There are so many 
choice: take bus, taxi, rent a car, buy a car, buy a leisure car, buy a 
air ticket,  rent a helicopter, or even buy your own aircraft.


I would more recommend to see what you really need (Requirement), how 
many budget do you have (Resource) and start from there.


BTW, here are some my opinions:
- If you do not have a solid technical development team, please don't 
choose open source.
- If you do not have a powerful budget, there is no need to compare with 
big organizations.
- Subscription service becomes more an more popular, it is worth to take 
a look.


Hope it helps.

--
Jing Xiao

Senior Programmer
L-1005, System, QEII Library
Memorial University, St. John's, NL, A1B 3Y1


On 9/20/2012 1:19 PM, Sean Hannan wrote:

Every one of these sites is not going to work for everyone.

Please conduct your own user research for your own audience.

Our users, for example, have no interest in visualizations of search
results.

Our researchers actually want just a list of results. They are compiling
bibliographies or reading lists and they honestly just want a really long
page of titles and authors of what we have.

-Sean

On 9/20/12 11:03 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:


Every one of this suggestions has one major flaw, IMO. The primary
result of a search is a big set of bibliographic records -- more than
the user can possible look through. In some of them there are facets
available, but in no case is there any useful analysis of set in a
visualization that would allow the user to get a picture of what she has
retrieved. I'm thinking timelines, a la' WorldCat Identities or the Open
Library subject pages [1]. Also, none of them tell the user more about
the person or subject or work that they have retrieved. (At least, in
the views that I have seen.) I really think that lists of manifestations
just aren't good enough when searches bring up hundreds of results.

kc
[1] some examples:
http://openlibrary.org/subjects/halley%27s_comet
http://openlibrary.org/subjects/place:istanbul_%28turkey%29
and see others at: http://openlibrary.org/subjects
or look for your favorites


On 9/20/12 6:03 AM, Hamilton, Gill wrote:

My current fav is Digital NZ
http://www.digitalnz.org/

Gill
--
Gill Hamilton
Digital Access Manager
National Library of Scotland
Edinburgh, Scotland
g.hamil...@nls.uk


-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Tania Fersenheim
Sent: 19 September 2012 20:00
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
e.g.:

   - library catalog
   - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
   - ejournals
   - ebooks
   - libguides
   - library web site
   - worldcat local
   - that kind o' stuff

I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

Tania





This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Karen Coyle

And I presume that you have quantitative evidence to show that.

kc

On 9/20/12 8:49 AM, Sean Hannan wrote:

Every one of these sites is not going to work for everyone.

Please conduct your own user research for your own audience.

Our users, for example, have no interest in visualizations of search
results.

Our researchers actually want just a list of results. They are compiling
bibliographies or reading lists and they honestly just want a really long
page of titles and authors of what we have.

-Sean

On 9/20/12 11:03 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:


Every one of this suggestions has one major flaw, IMO. The primary
result of a search is a big set of bibliographic records -- more than
the user can possible look through. In some of them there are facets
available, but in no case is there any useful analysis of set in a
visualization that would allow the user to get a picture of what she has
retrieved. I'm thinking timelines, a la' WorldCat Identities or the Open
Library subject pages [1]. Also, none of them tell the user more about
the person or subject or work that they have retrieved. (At least, in
the views that I have seen.) I really think that lists of manifestations
just aren't good enough when searches bring up hundreds of results.

kc
[1] some examples:
http://openlibrary.org/subjects/halley%27s_comet
http://openlibrary.org/subjects/place:istanbul_%28turkey%29
and see others at: http://openlibrary.org/subjects
or look for your favorites


On 9/20/12 6:03 AM, Hamilton, Gill wrote:

My current fav is Digital NZ
http://www.digitalnz.org/

Gill
--
Gill Hamilton
Digital Access Manager
National Library of Scotland
Edinburgh, Scotland
g.hamil...@nls.uk


-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Tania Fersenheim
Sent: 19 September 2012 20:00
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
e.g.:

   - library catalog
   - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
   - ejournals
   - ebooks
   - libguides
   - library web site
   - worldcat local
   - that kind o' stuff

I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

Tania



--
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Sean Hannan
That's what user research is.  Qualitative evidence, too.

-Sean


On 9/20/12 1:18 PM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:

 And I presume that you have quantitative evidence to show that.
 
 kc
 
 On 9/20/12 8:49 AM, Sean Hannan wrote:
 Every one of these sites is not going to work for everyone.
 
 Please conduct your own user research for your own audience.
 
 Our users, for example, have no interest in visualizations of search
 results.
 
 Our researchers actually want just a list of results. They are compiling
 bibliographies or reading lists and they honestly just want a really long
 page of titles and authors of what we have.
 
 -Sean
 
 On 9/20/12 11:03 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:
 
 Every one of this suggestions has one major flaw, IMO. The primary
 result of a search is a big set of bibliographic records -- more than
 the user can possible look through. In some of them there are facets
 available, but in no case is there any useful analysis of set in a
 visualization that would allow the user to get a picture of what she has
 retrieved. I'm thinking timelines, a la' WorldCat Identities or the Open
 Library subject pages [1]. Also, none of them tell the user more about
 the person or subject or work that they have retrieved. (At least, in
 the views that I have seen.) I really think that lists of manifestations
 just aren't good enough when searches bring up hundreds of results.
 
 kc
 [1] some examples:
 http://openlibrary.org/subjects/halley%27s_comet
 http://openlibrary.org/subjects/place:istanbul_%28turkey%29
 and see others at: http://openlibrary.org/subjects
 or look for your favorites
 
 
 On 9/20/12 6:03 AM, Hamilton, Gill wrote:
 My current fav is Digital NZ
 http://www.digitalnz.org/
 
 Gill
 --
 Gill Hamilton
 Digital Access Manager
 National Library of Scotland
 Edinburgh, Scotland
 g.hamil...@nls.uk
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
 Tania Fersenheim
 Sent: 19 September 2012 20:00
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers
 
 Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL
 
 I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
 successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
 e.g.:
 
- library catalog
- federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
 Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
- ejournals
- ebooks
- libguides
- library web site
- worldcat local
- that kind o' stuff
 
 I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
 use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
 technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?
 
 Tania
 


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Karen Coyle

So, do you have any? I'll tell you what I know:

On average, users rarely go beyond the second page of any retrieved set, 
whether in a library catalog or on Google. This of course wreaks hell 
with the FRBR concepts of identify and select which is supposed to 
be on the results of a find.


In 1982, when we brought up the first U of Calif union catalog, the 
technology was telnet: 18 lines, 70 characters per line. At most we got 
two items, sometimes only one, on a screen. Statistically, the average 
viewing was 2.5 screens.


Later, maybe 1986? 88? we moved to a web interface. We could now get 10 
items on a screen. Statistically, the average viewing was 2.5 screens.


I've read, but unfortunately right now cannot find, that you never want 
to drop below screen 2 of google results or you're essentially invisible 
(in the SEO literature).


So, given this, and given that in a decent-sized catalog users regularly 
retrieve hundreds or thousands of items, what is the best way to help 
them grok that set given that the number of records is too large for 
the user to look at them one-by-one to make a decision? Can the fact 
that the data is in a database help users get a feel for what they 
have retrieved without having to look at every record? What is the net 
result of the fact that users don't go generally beyond screen 2? (In 
the U of Calif catalog, it meant that no one looked beyond items  with a 
author whose name sorted in the A's.)


kc


On 9/20/12 10:26 AM, Sean Hannan wrote:

That's what user research is.  Qualitative evidence, too.

-Sean


On 9/20/12 1:18 PM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:


And I presume that you have quantitative evidence to show that.

kc

On 9/20/12 8:49 AM, Sean Hannan wrote:

Every one of these sites is not going to work for everyone.

Please conduct your own user research for your own audience.

Our users, for example, have no interest in visualizations of search
results.

Our researchers actually want just a list of results. They are compiling
bibliographies or reading lists and they honestly just want a really long
page of titles and authors of what we have.

-Sean

On 9/20/12 11:03 AM, Karen Coyle li...@kcoyle.net wrote:


Every one of this suggestions has one major flaw, IMO. The primary
result of a search is a big set of bibliographic records -- more than
the user can possible look through. In some of them there are facets
available, but in no case is there any useful analysis of set in a
visualization that would allow the user to get a picture of what she has
retrieved. I'm thinking timelines, a la' WorldCat Identities or the Open
Library subject pages [1]. Also, none of them tell the user more about
the person or subject or work that they have retrieved. (At least, in
the views that I have seen.) I really think that lists of manifestations
just aren't good enough when searches bring up hundreds of results.

kc
[1] some examples:
http://openlibrary.org/subjects/halley%27s_comet
http://openlibrary.org/subjects/place:istanbul_%28turkey%29
and see others at: http://openlibrary.org/subjects
or look for your favorites


On 9/20/12 6:03 AM, Hamilton, Gill wrote:

My current fav is Digital NZ
http://www.digitalnz.org/

Gill
--
Gill Hamilton
Digital Access Manager
National Library of Scotland
Edinburgh, Scotland
g.hamil...@nls.uk


-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of
Tania Fersenheim
Sent: 19 September 2012 20:00
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
e.g.:

- library catalog
- federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
- ejournals
- ebooks
- libguides
- library web site
- worldcat local
- that kind o' stuff

I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

Tania



--
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Dave Caroline
There are plenty users who go beyond screen 2, I know I do.

Dave Caroline


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Karen Coyle

Of course they do. This might help:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average

On 9/20/12 10:52 AM, Dave Caroline wrote:

There are plenty users who go beyond screen 2, I know I do.

Dave Caroline


--
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net  http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Marc Truitt
On 2012-09-20 14:39, Karen Coyle wrote:
 What is the net result of the fact that users don't go generally
 beyond screen 2? (In the U of Calif catalog, it meant that no one
 looked beyond items  with a author whose name sorted in the A's.)

Umm... (even more) crappy scholarship?

- mt

-- 
*
Marc Truitt
University Librarian,   voice  : 506-364-2567
Mount Allison Universitye-mail : mtru...@mta.ca
Libraries and Archives  fax:
49 York Street  cell   : 506-232-0503
Sackville, NB  E4L 1C6

There is a grave inconsistency between the requirements for academic
excellence and professional achievement and the student-pleasing
priorities of the youth-centred realities of our time.  It remains to
be seen what gives first:  the standards and requirements of the
academy or the expectations and demands of young people.
   - Ken Coates and Bill Morrison, 2011
*

-- 
*
Marc Truitt
Associate University Librarian,
Bibliographic and Information   Voice  : 780-492-4770
Technology Services e-mail : marc.tru...@ualberta.ca
University of Alberta Libraries fax: 780-492-9243
Cameron Library cell   : 780-217-0356
Edmonton, AB  T6G 2J8

But all the towns and people seem to fade into a bad dream
And the steel rails still ain't heard the news
The conductor sings his songs again,
The passengers will please refrain
This train's got the disappearing railroad blues.
   -- Steve Goodman, 1970
*

-- 
*
Marc Truitt
University Librarian,   voice  : 506-364-2567
Mount Allison Universitye-mail : mtru...@mta.ca
Libraries and Archives  fax:
49 York Street  cell   : 506-232-0503
Sackville, NB  E4L 1C6

Well, I left my happy home to see what I could find out
I left my folk and friends with the aim to clear my mind out
Well, I hit the rowdy road and many kinds I met there
Many stories told me of the way to get there...
-- Cat Stevens (1970)
*


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Jonathan Rochkind

On 9/20/2012 1:39 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:


So, given this, and given that in a decent-sized catalog users regularly
retrieve hundreds or thousands of items, what is the best way to help
them grok that set given that the number of records is too large for
the user to look at them one-by-one to make a decision? Can the fact
that the data is in a database help users get a feel for what they
have retrieved without having to look at every record?


I've often felt that, if it can be properly presented, facets are a 
really great way to do this.  Facets (with hit counts next to every 
value) give you a 'profile' of a result set that is too large for you to 
get a sense of otherwise, they give you a sort of descriptive 
statistical summary of it.


When the facets are 'actionable', as they are usually, they also let you 
then drill down to particular aspects of the giant result set you are 
interested in, and get a _different_ 2.5 screens of results you'll look at.


Of course, library studies also often show that our users don't use the 
facets, heh. But there are a few conflicting studies that shows they are 
used a significant minority of the time. I think it may have to do with 
UI issues of how the facets are presented.


It's also important to remember that it doesn't neccesarily represent a 
failure if the user's don't engage with the results beyond the first 2.5 
screens -- it may mean they got what they wanted/needed in those first 
2.5 screens.


And likewise, that it's okay for us libraries to develop features which 
are used only by significant minorities of our users (important to 
remember what our logs show is really significant minorities of _uses_. 
 All users using a feature 1% of the time can show up the same as 1% of 
users using a feature 100% of the time).  We are not lowest common 
denominator, while we need to make our interfaces _usable_ by everyone 
(lowest common denominator perhaps), it's part of our mission to provide 
functionality in those interfaces for especially sophisticated uses that 
won't be used by everyone all the time.


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Rene Wiermer
Promoting our own site:
http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org

We are aggregating bibliographic records from 48 European national
libraries, major research libraries and some other free sources. We
also feature some special exhibitions, full text content and some
federated search for those collections that cannot be harvested.

It is a complete in-house development,Java/Solr based, from
aggregation and processing framework to frontend, using Apache Wicket.

Regards,
Rene Wiermer


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Nate Hill
I keep on thinking about how infrequently I use search to surface the media
that I want.

I mean, if I was doing serious research yeah I'd search and drill way past
2.5 pages of results, I'd look at facets, I'd go bananas getting to the
stuff I need to get to.

But increasingly I deal with interfaces that treat search as a secondary
feature, with predictive or popular results being visually pushed to the
'home page'.

Think about your Apple TV, for example.






On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rene Wiermer rwier...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Promoting our own site:
 http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org

 We are aggregating bibliographic records from 48 European national
 libraries, major research libraries and some other free sources. We
 also feature some special exhibitions, full text content and some
 federated search for those collections that cannot be harvested.

 It is a complete in-house development,Java/Solr based, from
 aggregation and processing framework to frontend, using Apache Wicket.

 Regards,
 Rene Wiermer




-- 
Nate Hill
nathanielh...@gmail.com
http://4thfloor.chattlibrary.org/
http://www.natehill.net


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Ross Singer
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Nate Hill wrote:
 I keep on thinking about how infrequently I use search to surface the media
 that I want.
 
 

If this includes Google, I would say you are in the solid minority with this 
approach to discovery. 
 
 I mean, if I was doing serious research yeah I'd search and drill way past
 2.5 pages of results, I'd look at facets, I'd go bananas getting to the
 stuff I need to get to.
 
 

I guess I'm skeptical about this pages and pages of results for stuff that 
people are researching.  Going back to Google (where searches frequently 
result in thousands of pages of results), I'm really only overwhelmed with the 
signal to noise ratio when I'm trying to search for a very specific problem 
that has very common terms.  Like Airplay icon not appearing. 
 
 But increasingly I deal with interfaces that treat search as a secondary
 feature, with predictive or popular results being visually pushed to the
 'home page'.
 
 Think about your Apple TV, for example.
This is actually a feature I never use on my Apple TV.  Analogous would be 
Amazon's homepage (I can't say I've ever serendipitously bought something 
'recommended' for me on the homepage, although I have bought recommended things 
after search) or Netflix.  I do sometimes use Netflix's suggestions to help jog 
my memory of stuff to search for, however.

I think, at the end of the day, discovery is hard and is VERY specific to the 
task, collection and individual (all three of which are variables) and 
shouldn't be limited to a particular approach.

-Ross.


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Kyle Banerjee

 And likewise, that it's okay for us libraries to develop features which
 are used only by significant minorities of our users (important to remember
 what our logs show is really significant minorities of _uses_.  All users
 using a feature 1% of the time can show up the same as 1% of users using a
 feature 100% of the time).  We are not lowest common denominator, while we
 need to make our interfaces _usable_ by everyone (lowest common denominator
 perhaps), it's part of our mission to provide functionality in those
 interfaces for especially sophisticated uses that won't be used by everyone
 all the time.


Exactly. When designing services, it is natural for people to use
popularity based metrics (i.e. how much does something get used) as an
indicator of quality. But such logic is dangerous, because if we accept it
we must agree that McDonalds makes the best food on earth.

The value is of what we produce is ultimately in the impact, and
limitations in the tools commonly used to quantify this should not be used
as a substitute for thinking.

kyle


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Karen Coyle
Jonathan, I, too, like the use of facets. I wish we could do something a 
bit more zing with them, like present them as word clouds or something 
a bit more appealing than term (number) but I think the basic data is 
there.


Facets, as we use them, though, function as set *narrowing* tools. 
That's very useful when you have a large set, but I'd like to see 
another function that leads users to nearby areas -- this obviously 
invokes the idea of topic maps. although I have to admit that topic maps 
don't always seem very provocative. There's probably some way that we 
could do them better.


I do think that both facets and topic maps may work better using 
FAST-type headings rather than full LCSH pre-coordinated subject 
headings. That FAST is derived from LCSH (rather than being developed 
specifically as a faceted classification) probably makes it something of 
an under-performer, but the related subjects that appear on the Open 
Library subject pages give a clue as to how something like this might 
work. I'd love to see more experimentation in this direction.


kc


On 9/20/12 12:55 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:

On 9/20/2012 1:39 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:


So, given this, and given that in a decent-sized catalog users regularly
retrieve hundreds or thousands of items, what is the best way to help
them grok that set given that the number of records is too large for
the user to look at them one-by-one to make a decision? Can the fact
that the data is in a database help users get a feel for what they
have retrieved without having to look at every record?


I've often felt that, if it can be properly presented, facets are a 
really great way to do this.  Facets (with hit counts next to every 
value) give you a 'profile' of a result set that is too large for you 
to get a sense of otherwise, they give you a sort of descriptive 
statistical summary of it.


When the facets are 'actionable', as they are usually, they also let 
you then drill down to particular aspects of the giant result set you 
are interested in, and get a _different_ 2.5 screens of results you'll 
look at.


Of course, library studies also often show that our users don't use 
the facets, heh. But there are a few conflicting studies that shows 
they are used a significant minority of the time. I think it may have 
to do with UI issues of how the facets are presented.


It's also important to remember that it doesn't neccesarily represent 
a failure if the user's don't engage with the results beyond the first 
2.5 screens -- it may mean they got what they wanted/needed in those 
first 2.5 screens.


And likewise, that it's okay for us libraries to develop features 
which are used only by significant minorities of our users (important 
to remember what our logs show is really significant minorities of 
_uses_.  All users using a feature 1% of the time can show up the same 
as 1% of users using a feature 100% of the time).  We are not lowest 
common denominator, while we need to make our interfaces _usable_ by 
everyone (lowest common denominator perhaps), it's part of our mission 
to provide functionality in those interfaces for especially 
sophisticated uses that won't be used by everyone all the time.


--
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Nate Hill
I made this sound like way too much of a blanket statement. I agree with
you. Allow me to refine what im saying a little later...

On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Ross Singer wrote:

 On Thursday, September 20, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Nate Hill wrote:
  I keep on thinking about how infrequently I use search to surface the
 media
  that I want.
 
 

 If this includes Google, I would say you are in the solid minority with
 this approach to discovery.
 
  I mean, if I was doing serious research yeah I'd search and drill way
 past
  2.5 pages of results, I'd look at facets, I'd go bananas getting to the
  stuff I need to get to.
 
 

 I guess I'm skeptical about this pages and pages of results for stuff that
 people are researching.  Going back to Google (where searches frequently
 result in thousands of pages of results), I'm really only overwhelmed with
 the signal to noise ratio when I'm trying to search for a very specific
 problem that has very common terms.  Like Airplay icon not appearing.
 
  But increasingly I deal with interfaces that treat search as a secondary
  feature, with predictive or popular results being visually pushed to the
  'home page'.
 
  Think about your Apple TV, for example.
 This is actually a feature I never use on my Apple TV.  Analogous would be
 Amazon's homepage (I can't say I've ever serendipitously bought something
 'recommended' for me on the homepage, although I have bought recommended
 things after search) or Netflix.  I do sometimes use Netflix's suggestions
 to help jog my memory of stuff to search for, however.

 I think, at the end of the day, discovery is hard and is VERY specific to
 the task, collection and individual (all three of which are variables) and
 shouldn't be limited to a particular approach.

 -Ross.



-- 
Nate Hill
nathanielh...@gmail.com
http://4thfloor.chattlibrary.org/
http://www.natehill.net


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread BWS Johnson
Salvete!

Jonathan, I, too, like the use of facets. I wish we could do something a bit 
more zing with them, like present them as word clouds or something a bit 
more appealing than term (number) but I think the basic data is there.

Facets, as we use them, though, function as set *narrowing* tools. That's very 
useful when you have a large set, but I'd like to see another function that 
leads users to nearby areas -- this obviously invokes the idea of topic maps. 
although I have to admit that topic maps don't always seem very provocative. 
There's probably some way that we could do them better.

I do think that both facets and topic maps may work better using FAST-type 
headings rather than full LCSH pre-coordinated subject headings. That FAST is 
derived from LCSH (rather than being developed specifically as a faceted 
classification) probably makes it something of an under-performer, but the 
related subjects that appear on the Open Library subject pages give a clue as 
to how something like this might work. I'd love to see more experimentation in 
this direction.



    Mebbe summat like

http://liveplasma.com/

    ? I have ever thought that it was quite sexy, and shamlessly used it for 
music collection development and listener's advisory. Now it's bigger than just 
music, which is sweet as, bro.

Cheers,
Brooke


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Karen Coyle

On 9/20/12 2:54 PM, BWS Johnson wrote:
Mebbe summat like http://liveplasma.com/ ? I have ever thought 
that it was quite sexy, and shamlessly used it for music collection 
development and listener's advisory. Now it's bigger than just music, 
which is sweet as, bro. Cheers, Brooke 


Hmm. Do they tell you anywhere how they make their connections between 
works?


There's something similar being experimented with by the National 
Library of Spain:


http://bne.linkeddata.es/graphvis/

This is just experimental and I don't know what drives this particular 
picture, which seems to be focused around Cervantes --


kc

--
Karen Coyle
kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread Penelope Campbell
It may not be what you are thinking of, but see

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ 

the best way to see it in action is to do a search.


Penelope Campbell | Library Manager
Department of Family and Community Services | Housing NSW
T 02 8753 8732 | F 02 8753 8734
A Ground Floor, 223-239 Liverpool Road Ashfield NSW, 2131
A Locked bag 4001 Ashfield BC NSW, 1800
E penelope.campb...@facs.nsw.gov.au
W www.housing.nsw.gov.au


==

Security Statement
 
This email may be confidential and contain privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this 
email, including any attachments. Confidentiality and legal privilege attached 
to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to 
you. If you have received the email in error please delete and notify the 
sender. Any views expressed in this email are those of the author and do not 
necessarily represent those of the department, except where the sender 
expressly, and with authority, states them to be the views of the Department of 
Family and Community Services NSW. The department does not represent, warrant 
or guarantee that the integrity of this email has been maintained, or that the 
communication is free of error, virus, interception, inference or interference.

==


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-20 Thread stuart yeates

On 21/09/12 12:52, Penelope Campbell wrote:

It may not be what you are thinking of, but see

http://trove.nla.gov.au/

the best way to see it in action is to do a search.


http://www.digitalnz.org/ and it's skins such as 
http://nzresearch.org.nz/ are also pretty good, not that I'm trying to 
encourage trans-Tasman rivalry.


cheers
stuart

--
Stuart Yeates
Library Technology Services http://www.victoria.ac.nz/library/


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-19 Thread Bess Sadler
Hi, Tania. 

I think there are some amazing examples among these Blacklight interfaces: 
https://github.com/projectblacklight/blacklight/wiki/Examples
There are a bunch there, but I'll let the people who maintain them tout their 
own. 

Of course I'm particularly partial to SearchWorks, our instance here at 
Stanford:

http://searchworks.stanford.edu

You don't mention institutional repository interfaces, but I believe they 
successfully and elegantly integrate discovery of various resources, so maybe 
these examples of hydra will be of interest too:

http://projecthydra.org/apps-demos-2-2-2/

Cheers, 
Bess

On Sep 19, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Tania Fersenheim wrote:

 Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL
 
 I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
 successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
 e.g.:
 
 - library catalog
 - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
 Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
 - ejournals
 - ebooks
 - libguides
 - library web site
 - worldcat local
 - that kind o' stuff
 
 I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
 use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
 technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?
 
 Tania
 
 -- 
 
 Tania Fersenheim
 Manager of Library Systems
 
 Brandeis University
 Library and Technology Services
 
 415 South Street, (MS 017/P.O. Box 549110)
 Waltham, MA 02454-9110
 Phone: 781.736.4698
 Fax: 781.736.4577
 email: tan...@brandeis.edu


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-19 Thread Keith Jenkins
It's not a library, but the McMaster-Carr product catalog is a classic:
http://www.mcmaster.com/

Keith


On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Tania Fersenheim tan...@brandeis.edu wrote:
 Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

 I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
 successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
 e.g.:

  - library catalog
  - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
 Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
  - ejournals
  - ebooks
  - libguides
  - library web site
  - worldcat local
  - that kind o' stuff

 I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
 use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
 technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

 Tania

 --

 Tania Fersenheim
 Manager of Library Systems

 Brandeis University
 Library and Technology Services

 415 South Street, (MS 017/P.O. Box 549110)
 Waltham, MA 02454-9110
 Phone: 781.736.4698
 Fax: 781.736.4577
 email: tan...@brandeis.edu


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-19 Thread Sian Meikle
Full disclosure -- it IS our library's site -- but the University of Toronto 
Libraries use a drupal frontend to integrate our library catalogue (Endeca), 
Summon (local presentation powered by Summon APIs), e-journals (a filtered 
subset of catalogue data via Endeca), and resource guides (LibGuides).

These services, in turn, integrate other data: for example:
--  permitted uses (eg licensed rights) data is integrated directly in the 
catalogue and Summon interfaces for digital titles;
-- the catalogue also uses StackMap to display shelf locations for some 
libraries.
-- the catalogue offers a locally-developed shelf browse that integrates print 
collections system wide with digital collections

Start here:
http://www.library.utoronto.ca

We, in turn, are long-time admirers of the NCSU libraries and their discovery 
interface work (http://library.ncsu.edu/)

Sian Meikle
--
Sian Meikle 416.946.3689 (work)416.978.1668 (fax)
130 St. George St, 7th floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A5
Interim Director, ITS, University of Toronto Libraries

From: Code for Libraries [CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Tania 
Fersenheim [tan...@brandeis.edu]
Sent: September-19-12 3:00 PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

Got a favorite discovery interface?  Send me the URL

I am doing some quick  dirty investigation into libraries that have
successfully and elegantly integrated discovery of various resources,
e.g.:

 - library catalog
 - federated indexing service such as  Serials Solutions or Primo
Central, or a federated search system like Metalib
 - ejournals
 - ebooks
 - libguides
 - library web site
 - worldcat local
 - that kind o' stuff

I am looking for sites that are both nice to look at and seem easy to
use.  I will assume that if you're touting your own site it is
technologically sophisticated.  :-D  Got any faves?

Tania

--

Tania Fersenheim
Manager of Library Systems

Brandeis University
Library and Technology Services

415 South Street, (MS 017/P.O. Box 549110)
Waltham, MA 02454-9110
Phone: 781.736.4698
Fax: 781.736.4577
email: tan...@brandeis.edu


Re: [CODE4LIB] Seeking examples of outstanding discovery layers

2012-09-19 Thread Alexander Johannesen
I love the Trove from the National Library of Australia ;

   http://trove.nla.gov.au/


Alex
-- 
 Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
--- http://shelter.nu/blog/ --
-- http://www.google.com/profiles/alexander.johannesen ---