Don't know. I'm on both lists, as I imagine most people are. I didn't pay
much attention to the various threads to see which list they were on ;).
The perl4lib list doesn't get much traffic, that's for sure.
Jon Gorman
Original message
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:15:04 -0600
From:
On Jan 23, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Doran, Michael D wrote:
There *is* still a perl4lib list and these would have been relevant
postings...
I suppose I am guilty party here, and I posted to code4lib because it
seems to be a more vibrant community. Moreover, people who do not
program in Perl may have
PM
To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions
On Jan 23, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Doran, Michael D wrote:
There *is* still a perl4lib list and these would have been relevant
postings...
I suppose I am guilty party here, and I posted to code4lib
because it seems
I don't code PERL, but I enjoy reading about languages that aren't in my
toolkit. Often I find that I can learn something more high-leve from such
discussion. The PERL 6 thread on Web4lib was particularly interesting this week.
- David
---
David Cloutman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electronic Services
I second this - especially for those of us who aren't currently learning
Perl, but who expect they probably will at some point.
Yitzchak Schaffer
Systems Librarian
Touro College Libraries
33 West 23rd Street
New York, NY 10010
Tel (212) 463-0400 x230
Fax (212) 627-3197
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 23, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Doran, Michael D wrote:
I suppose I am guilty party here...
It wasn't in any way my intention to point an accusatory finger at
anybody!
No accusatory offense was taken. I was simply trying to be humble, or
something.
--
Eric Lease Morgan
On Jan 23, 2008 6:34 PM, Doran, Michael D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering if we'll soon reach the point where the perl4lib list is not
worth subscribing to. I'm not looking for any definitive answer here... I
guess I'm just a little sad to see an old favorite lose its relevance. :-/
