Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions

2008-01-23 Thread Jonathan Gorman
Don't know.  I'm on both lists, as I imagine most people are.  I didn't pay 
much attention to the various threads to see which list they were on ;).

The perl4lib list doesn't get much traffic, that's for sure.

Jon Gorman

 Original message 
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:15:04 -0600
From: Doran, Michael D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CODE4LIB] perl questions
To: CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu

 Subject: [CODE4LIB] perl question
 Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:54 PM

 Subject: [CODE4LIB] perl6
 Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 7:01 AM

There *is* still a perl4lib list and these would have been relevant postings 
[1].  Do the code connoisseurs on *this* list now consider perl4lib déclassé 
or redundant for perl questions and discussions?  I'm not trying to dictate 
where people post -- I'm just curious.

Always the last one to know...
-- Michael

[1] The perl4lib page
http://perl4lib.perl.org/

# Michael Doran, Systems Librarian
# University of Texas at Arlington
# 817-272-5326 office
# 817-688-1926 mobile
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# http://rocky.uta.edu/doran/


Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions

2008-01-23 Thread Eric Lease Morgan

On Jan 23, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Doran, Michael D wrote:


There *is* still a perl4lib list and these would have been relevant
postings...


I suppose I am guilty party here, and I posted to code4lib because it
seems to be a more vibrant community. Moreover, people who do not
program in Perl may have additional observations to bear.

--
Eric Lease Morgan


Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions

2008-01-23 Thread Doran, Michael D
Hi Eric,

 I suppose I am guilty party here...

It wasn't in any way my intention to point an accusatory finger at anybody!

 ...and I posted to code4lib because it seems to be a
 more vibrant community.

Oh, without a doubt, that is the case.

 Moreover, people who do not program in Perl may have additional
 observations to bear.

Also quite true.

I imagine that there's significant overlap in subscribers for the two lists, 
and I don't think any of us want people to start cross-posting every perl 
question to both lists.  But if people are choosing to post perl stuff just to 
code4lib (and I can't argue with the reasons above), I'm wondering if we'll 
soon reach the point where the perl4lib list is not worth subscribing to.  I'm 
not looking for any definitive answer here... I guess I'm just a little sad to 
see an old favorite lose its relevance.  :-/

-- Michael

# Michael Doran, Systems Librarian
# University of Texas at Arlington
# 817-272-5326 office
# 817-688-1926 mobile
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# http://rocky.uta.edu/doran/


 -Original Message-
 From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Eric Lease Morgan
 Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 3:06 PM
 To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU
 Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions

 On Jan 23, 2008, at 3:15 PM, Doran, Michael D wrote:

  There *is* still a perl4lib list and these would have been relevant
  postings...

 I suppose I am guilty party here, and I posted to code4lib
 because it seems to be a more vibrant community. Moreover,
 people who do not program in Perl may have additional
 observations to bear.

 --
 Eric Lease Morgan



Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions

2008-01-23 Thread Cloutman, David
I don't code PERL, but I enjoy reading about languages that aren't in my 
toolkit. Often I find that I can learn something more high-leve from such 
discussion. The PERL 6 thread on Web4lib was particularly interesting this week.

- David

---
David Cloutman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electronic Services Librarian
Marin County Free Library

-Original Message-
From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doran, Michael D
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:15 PM
To: CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu
Subject: [CODE4LIB] perl questions


 Subject: [CODE4LIB] perl question
 Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:54 PM

 Subject: [CODE4LIB] perl6
 Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 7:01 AM

There *is* still a perl4lib list and these would have been relevant postings 
[1].  Do the code connoisseurs on *this* list now consider perl4lib déclassé or 
redundant for perl questions and discussions?  I'm not trying to dictate where 
people post -- I'm just curious.

Always the last one to know...
-- Michael

[1] The perl4lib page
http://perl4lib.perl.org/

# Michael Doran, Systems Librarian
# University of Texas at Arlington
# 817-272-5326 office
# 817-688-1926 mobile
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# http://rocky.uta.edu/doran/

Email Disclaimer: http://www.co.marin.ca.us/nav/misc/EmailDisclaimer.cfm


Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions

2008-01-23 Thread Yitzchak Schaffer

I second this - especially for those of us who aren't currently learning
Perl, but who expect they probably will at some point.

Yitzchak Schaffer
Systems Librarian
Touro College Libraries
33 West 23rd Street
New York, NY 10010
Tel (212) 463-0400 x230
Fax (212) 627-3197
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Cloutman, David wrote:

I don't code PERL, but I enjoy reading about languages that aren't in my 
toolkit. Often I find that I can learn something more high-leve from such 
discussion. The PERL 6 thread on Web4lib was particularly interesting this week.

- David

---
David Cloutman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electronic Services Librarian
Marin County Free Library



Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions

2008-01-23 Thread Eric Lease Morgan

On Jan 23, 2008, at 6:34 PM, Doran, Michael D wrote:


I suppose I am guilty party here...


It wasn't in any way my intention to point an accusatory finger at
anybody!



No accusatory offense was taken. I was simply trying to be humble, or
something.

--
Eric Lease Morgan


Re: [CODE4LIB] perl questions

2008-01-23 Thread Ed Summers
On Jan 23, 2008 6:34 PM, Doran, Michael D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'm wondering if we'll soon reach the point where the perl4lib list is not 
 worth subscribing to.  I'm not looking for any definitive answer here... I 
 guess I'm just a little sad to see an old favorite lose its relevance.  :-/

Don't be sad :-) The code4lib list came into existence because a bunch
of people on the perl4lib list (and elsewhere) realized tat talking
about libraries and programming only in the scope of perl was too
limiting...and the proliferation of *4lib discussions was an
anti-pattern of sorts.

I think in hindsight this was the right decision to make, considering
the conference and everything.

//Ed